owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 | viriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii (DOSX)
> You probably need to change code a bit to break the "virus"
> pattern but there may be problem
that you didn't fix any problem at all
> the "enummode" fix is simple. However, I'm unsure if I
> really should invest more time in this topic
NO you didn't break it -> you are not supposed to "fix" it
> it's likely to turn out to be a never-ending story.
Right Just switch to FASM or brew the PE's manually to get even more viriii and viriiiiii and viriiiiiiii ...
> Serious bug reports are welcome.
IIRC I've seen a thread full of such recently, I just can't find it now
> There's currently the problem that a lot of anti-virus
> software has started to flag the binaries in HXRT as
> malware - and consequently, www.japheth.de is about
> to be regarded as a source of malware.
Good. Do you get much angry mail about this "BUG" ?
As you are known to be very sensitive about BUG report validity and seriousness, you could just close all those "BUG" 's as INVALID. As prevention measures, just put a warning on your site:
There is no malware on this site. If you don't understand the purpose of the files, don't download them. They are not intended to be tested for virii. I don't accept complaints about such issues, if you have problems, just stop using your "antivirus" or my files.
or switch to 7-ZIP format and encrypt the files with a good password (revealed on your site):
Brain:ON_RTFM:True_Windaube:Out_ParanoidAboutVirii:False
> Yes, I also "experienced" this. I guess it's due to M$'s great
> "side-by-side execution" invention, which fixed some dozens of
> well-known problems and introduced some dozens of new,
> unknown problems.
> Whenever a program uses newer MSVC runtime dlls ( MSVCRx0.DLL ),
> you may expect such phenomenons. Progress is a delusion.
I see
---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***
Complete thread:
- owb under dos/HX - andrea936, 01.02.2011, 17:50 (DOSX)
- owb under dos/HX - Japheth, 01.02.2011, 18:36
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - DOS386, 02.02.2011, 05:31
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - Japheth, 02.02.2011, 09:55
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - RayeR, 02.02.2011, 18:32
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - RayeR, 02.02.2011, 22:48
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - Japheth, 03.02.2011, 09:19
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 | viriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii - DOS386, 03.02.2011, 10:09
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - RayeR, 03.02.2011, 15:30
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - Japheth, 04.02.2011, 08:14
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - Laaca, 04.02.2011, 10:38
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - RayeR, 04.02.2011, 13:36
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - Laaca, 04.02.2011, 10:38
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - Japheth, 04.02.2011, 08:14
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - andrea936, 03.02.2011, 22:24
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - Japheth, 03.02.2011, 09:19
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - RayeR, 02.02.2011, 22:48
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - RayeR, 02.02.2011, 18:32
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - andrea936, 02.02.2011, 23:48
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - Japheth, 03.02.2011, 09:14
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - Japheth, 02.02.2011, 09:55
- owb under dos/HX | HX 2.17 - DOS386, 02.02.2011, 05:31
- owb under dos/HX - Japheth, 01.02.2011, 18:36