Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to index page
Thread view  Board view
bencollver

Homepage

03.06.2024, 21:56
 

AWK 20230909 for DOS (AKA nawk) (Announce)

AWK 20230909 for DOS

Requires 8086 CPU or better.

https://archive.org/details/nawk-20230909-for-dos

gopher://tilde.pink/1/~bencollver/files/dos/devel/awk/

Rugxulo

Homepage

Usono,
07.06.2024, 04:26

@ bencollver
 

AWK 20230909 for DOS (AKA nawk)

> AWK 20230909 for DOS
>
> Requires 8086 CPU or better.

A few years ago, I rebuilt MAWK 1.2.2 with Turbo C++ because it was smaller than the default (1996) DOS+OS/2 family .EXE and could compress with UPX. So only 60 kb UPX'd. It leaves a fair bit of conventional memory too.

The previous DOS build of "one true" AWK for us was via OpenWatcom by Gunther Knauf, IIRC, way back in 2010. It works okay (and large model, apparently) but doesn't quite have as much free RAM as MAWK.

GAWK for DJGPP isn't actively maintained or supported anymore, but a port of 5.0 is from 2019.

* http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/unix/awk/

I only use "classic" OpenWatcom 1.9 since newer 2.0-pre hasn't been finalized (or perfectly tested, dunno). But FYI you can use "-za99" to allow some C99 features, e.g. "int blah = func();" (that you apparently worked around in a few places).

I probably had some other minor comments but can't remember. I'll take another look later.

usotsuki

07.06.2024, 06:09

@ Rugxulo
 

AWK 20230909 for DOS (AKA nawk)

> The previous DOS build of "one true" AWK for us was via OpenWatcom by
> Gunther Knauf, IIRC, way back in 2010. It works okay (and large model,
> apparently) but doesn't quite have as much free RAM as MAWK.

<snip>

> I only use "classic" OpenWatcom 1.9 since newer 2.0-pre hasn't been
> finalized (or perfectly tested, dunno). But FYI you can use "-za99" to
> allow some C99 features, e.g. "int blah = func();" (that you apparently
> worked around in a few places).

I don't seem to have had issues rolling bwk awk with OpenWatcom 1.9, from experience, but it's been a couple years and I don't really have a way to test it for brokenness.

Back to index page
Thread view  Board view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 255 users online (1 registered, 254 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum