DOS ain't dead

> Changes: "improved portable application support on Windows and MS-DOS
> systems"

Here with D+ Browser, up and running.

What does "improved portable application support" mean ?
Is it just easier to port to Windows and MS-DOS, or is there something else ?

---
AUSREG Consultancy http://www.ausreg.com
Tadpole Tunes http://www.tadpoletunes.com
Sna Keo Il http://www.tadpoletunes.com/sna_keo_il/

> Website: http://dplus-browser.sourceforge.net/

COOL

> improved portable application support on Windows and MS-DOG systems

???

Test results:

- needs hacky BAT file to run and has hardcoded pathes that one has to fix
- no Cookies (forget online Bancruptcying ...)
- CTL-C crashes (no C&P ...)
- file selector is very broken, crashes, and can even delete files inteded for upload ???
- random crashes
- whines about "NON-STANDARD refresh tag" (FASM forum)
- shows outdated pages (my new post is missing ... Wiki edits auto-reverted ... same problem as in other DOS browsers)
- can't login into SF
- TFM is outdated (Georg's one from 2011, 3 years old)

+ can post in FASM forum
+ can upload files if you try hard enough (tested with FASM forum)
+ can edit Wipkipedia (register:untested | login:untested | edit:OK(edit saved, no extra vandalism, no trunc with cca 40 KiB page, only std char's, problem char's untested), file upload:untested)

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

It hanged when trying to download large file (I wanted to test transfer speed on some CD image). Standrard Dillo seems to me better and links faster, no reason for d+...

---
DOS gives me freedom to unlimited HW access.