ron Australia, 05.12.2014, 01:01 |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? (Users) |
Is anyone aware of a recent DOS port of TIDY ? --- |
glennmcc North Jackson, Ohio (USA), 05.12.2014, 02:51 @ ron |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> Is anyone aware of a recent DOS port of TIDY ? --- |
ron Australia, 05.12.2014, 03:31 @ glennmcc |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> Unless you can build your own from the latest SRC code.... --- |
roytam 10.12.2014, 06:11 @ ron |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> > Unless you can build your own from the latest SRC code.... |
glennmcc North Jackson, Ohio (USA), 10.12.2014, 16:26 @ roytam |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> > > Unless you can build your own from the latest SRC code.... --- |
ron Australia, 10.12.2014, 23:06 @ roytam |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> > > Unless you can build your own from the latest SRC code.... --- |
marcov 13.12.2014, 19:17 @ ron |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> > Compiling from source isn't that hard for tidy. |
ron Australia, 13.12.2014, 20:59 @ marcov |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> > Maybe not hard for C-speakers, but I do not speak C. --- |
roytam 14.12.2014, 00:59 @ marcov |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> > > Compiling from source isn't that hard for tidy. |
DOS386 30.12.2014, 09:18 @ ron |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> Is anyone aware of a recent DOS port of TIDY ? --- |
glennmcc North Jackson, Ohio (USA), 30.12.2014, 22:59 @ DOS386 |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> > Is anyone aware of a recent DOS port of TIDY ? --- |
DOS386 31.12.2014, 13:16 @ glennmcc |
Any chance of current Tidy for DOS ? |
> but we already got it --- |