DOS ain't dead - MOV RIP,POASM

DOS386

01.05.2008, 04:59

MOV RIP,POASM (Developers)

http://openwatcom.org/index.php/Wasm No notice of JWASM yet :confused:

http://japheth.de/JWasm.html

Japheth wrote:

> JWasm is a fork of Open Watcom's WASM v1.7. It's intended to be a
> MASM v6 compatible, open source assembler.

Great :-)

Since JWASM has made such phenomenal progress in recent 1+1/2 months, the famous (but not really working) PO-ASM can now be considered as obsolete and dead, right ? :lol:

Tried to compile HIMEMX, but doesn't work, see shot :-( ... hoping for later versions

[image]

Tried also IDECHECK, also buggy, JWASM seems to dislike LEA insctruction (or was it the extremely "good" OFFFFFSET stuff inside it ??? :confused: ) , finally compiled after some hacks (still getting a two-column-warning, displayed in every pass again and again), but doesn't link :-(

> LIBS = duser32s.lib

COOL. :crying: OMF version of this got deleted just in HX 2.14 and the one from 2.13 doesn't work :-(

> 1.48: stack size reduced from 1 MB to 4 kB.

WOW !!! Stack is a decaying technology :lol:

Most other things obviously can't compile because of all those uncountable extremely heavy include files, some of them are not available at all ...

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Rugxulo Usono, 01.05.2008, 06:00 @ DOS386	MOV RIP,POASM Post reply
	> Tried to compile HIMEMX, but doesn't work, see shot ... hoping for > later versions What version did you try? On what OS? (Yeah, probably DOS ...) It seemed to assemble for me just now on XP. And at home on XP in the previous release it also worked. So I dunno why it doesn't work for you. (BTW, new version now shows "time elapsed"). Try again with the 4/28/2008 version or post more info.

DOS386

01.05.2008, 06:02

@ Rugxulo

MOV RIP,POASM

Post reply

> What version did you try?

1.7 :clap:

Again: exact compilation date&time needed :clap:

> On what OS? (Yeah, probably DOS ...)

:clap:

> Try again with the 4/28/2008 version or post more info.

I will :hungry:

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Japheth

Germany (South),
01.05.2008, 12:14

@ DOS386

MOV RIP,POASM

Post reply

> Since JWASM has made such phenomenal progress in recent 1+1/2 months, the
> famous (but not really working) PO-ASM can now be
> considered as obsolete and dead, right ? :lol:

it still supports COFF, which jwasm doesn't.

> > LIBS = duser32s.lib
>
> COOL. :crying: OMF version of this got deleted just in HX 2.14 and the one
> from 2.13 doesn't work :-(

WLINK can digest both OMF and COFF libs. However, there's a bug in WLINK of OW 1.7. It has been fixed in the meantime, just use the version from the jwasm project page.

(I updated IDECHECK.ZIP, which now uses jwasm+wlink by default.)

> Most other things obviously can't compile because of all those uncountable
> extremely heavy include files, some of them are not available at all ...

What are you talking about?

---
MS-DOS forever!

DOS386

02.05.2008, 21:47

@ Japheth

MOV RIP,POASM | JWLINK can mix OMF with COFF ?

Post reply

> it still supports COFF, which jwasm doesn't.

OK ... it's excellent ... except all those intentional "deliberate differences" making it unusable :-|

> WLINK can digest both OMF and COFF libs.

WOW ! Produce a valid EXE from any mix of COFF and OMF-32 OBJ's and LIB's ?

> I updated IDECHECK.ZIP, which now uses jwasm+wlink by default.

Thanks :-) I'll retest.

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

DOS386

09.05.2008, 07:50

@ Japheth

MOV RIP,POASM | WIN32inc, PESTUB.ASM, MACROS.INC

Post reply

> > Most other things obviously can't compile because of all those uncountable
> > extremely heavy include files, some of them are not available at all
> What are you talking about?

1. WIN32INC ... 1.2 MiB ZIP, 6.2 MiB extracted, 280 files in 22 DIR's ... it is extremely heavy :-P
2. MACROS.INC - where to get it ?

Update: IDECHECK compiles like a charm now (but to OBJ only, no PE :-( ), and also links, good size, but different content, doesn't work (starts and displays text, but IDE access crashes) ... what is the correct command line to link it ?

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Japheth

Germany (South),
09.05.2008, 09:39

@ DOS386

MOV RIP,POASM | WIN32inc, PESTUB.ASM, MACROS.INC

Post reply

> > > Most other things obviously can't compile because of all those
> uncountable
> > > extremely heavy include files, some of them are not available at all
> > What are you talking about?
>
> 1. WIN32INC ... 1.2 MiB ZIP, 6.2 MiB extracted, 280 files in 22 DIR's ...
> it is extremely heavy :-P
> 2. MACROS.INC - where to get it ?

Which tool requires MACROS.INC?

> Update: IDECHECK compiles like a charm now (but to OBJ only, no PE :-( ),
> and also links, good size, but different content, doesn't work (starts and
> displays text, but IDE access crashes) ... what is the correct command line
> to link it ?

The command to link IDECHECK can be found in MAKEFILE. It is

-------------------------------------------------------------------
wlink format windows nt runtime console file idecheck.obj op quiet,map, stub=\hx\bin\LOADPEX.BIN, stack=0x1000 LibPath \hx\Lib Library duser32s.lib

patchPE idecheck.exe
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Because it is not quite trivial and also somewhat crucial that the correct link params are used, it is - strongly - recommended to use MAKEFILE to create the binary.

---
MS-DOS forever!

DOS386

11.05.2008, 12:50

@ Japheth

MOV RIP,POASM | WIN32inc, PESTUB.ASM, MACROS.INC

Post reply

> Which tool requires MACROS.INC?

PESTUB (see subj)

> The command to link IDECHECK can be found in MAKEFILE.

I did pick it from there ... but something went wrong nevertheless :-( Retry :hungry:

Is it safe to delete the "LibPath \hx\Lib" if I place the "duser32s.lib" in same dir ?

> Because it is not quite trivial and also somewhat crucial that the correct link params

But JWASM at least needs source filename only, like FASM ?

JWASM IDECHECK.ASM
JWASM PESTUB.ASM

> is - strongly - recommended to use MAKEFILE to create the binary.

Yeah ... but then I need something that eats the MAKEFILE and 1'000'000 things in correct subdirs :-(

Also I'm still getting 1'000'000 errors in Win32Inc when compiling stuff including it :-(

What WLINK to use ? The one from JWASM page or JWASM source package ?

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Japheth

Germany (South),
11.05.2008, 20:05

@ DOS386

some infos

Post reply

> > Which tool requires MACROS.INC?
>
> PESTUB (see subj)

Ok, but there might be kind of confusion on your side. HX and Win32Inc are not linked. That is, to assemble a HX part (for example PESTUB), you don't need Win32Inc. Furthermore, HXDEV does contain a MACROS.INC file.

> > The command to link IDECHECK can be found in MAKEFILE.
>
> I did pick it from there ... but something went wrong nevertheless :-(
> Retry :hungry:
>
> Is it safe to delete the "LibPath \hx\Lib" if I place the "duser32s.lib"
> in same dir ?

Yes.

> Yeah ... but then I need something that eats the MAKEFILE and 1'000'000
> things in correct subdirs :-(

No. I usually use a NMAKE.EXE, which is just stored in a tools directory and doesn't need anything (besides KERNEL32/DKRNL32). For OW's WMAKE, I'm not sure however.

> Also I'm still getting 1'000'000 errors in Win32Inc when compiling stuff
> including it :-(

Might be a good idea to reveal 1 of the million errors so one can guess at least based on 1 tiny fact. Because, I don't get any errors and I bet there is no magic involved.

> What WLINK to use ? The one from JWASM page or JWASM source package ?

The one from the JWasm page is from the OW snapshot of March. There was a bug fixed concerning COFF libs. The old v1.7 linker won't accept COFF libs created by non-OW tools.

---
MS-DOS forever!

DOS386

31.05.2008, 03:05

@ Japheth

INC'ing

Post reply

> Ok, but there might be kind of confusion on your side.

YES :-(

> HX and Win32Inc are not linked. That is, to assemble a HX part
> (for example PESTUB), you don't need Win32Inc.

GOOD :-)

> Furthermore, HXDEV does contain a MACROS.INC file.

YES. I was searching at wrong place :-(

> I usually use a NMAKE.EXE, which is just stored in a tools directory

Of what ? It isn't in my copy of HXSRC 2.14 :confused:

> Might be a good idea to reveal 1 of the million errors so one can guess

Now using the HXDEV includes ... is better, only cca 100'000 errors in the includes when compiling PESTUB ... "?FLAT" is not (???) defined ?

At least, IDECHECK now compiles and links :-) no idea what stupid bug I had committed previously :-(

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Rugxulo Usono, 04.06.2008, 01:53 (edited by Rugxulo, 04.06.2008, 16:07) @ DOS386	INC'ing Post reply
	> > I usually use a NMAKE.EXE, which is just stored in a tools directory > > Of what ? It isn't in my copy of HXSRC 2.14 It's probably Microsoft's NMAKE. You might (very doubtful) be able to use wmake /ms instead. (BTW, there are many free make clones: GNU/DJGPP make, DMAKE, Ladsoft's IMAKE, etc.)

Berlin, Germany,
04.06.2008, 09:24

@ Rugxulo

INC'ing

Post reply

> It's probably Microsoft's NMAKE. You might (very doubtful) be able
> to use wmake /ms instead. (BTW, there are many free make clones:
> GNU/DJGPP make, Dmake, etc.)

But most have a different syntax.

---
Forum admin

Rugxulo

Usono,
04.06.2008, 16:06

@ rr

INC'ing

Post reply

> > It's probably Microsoft's NMAKE. You might (very doubtful) be
> able
> > to use wmake /ms instead. (BTW, there are many free make clones:
> > GNU/DJGPP make, Dmake, etc.)
>
> But most have a different syntax.

Yes, but they more or less serve the same purpose. And Japheth is allowed to use whichever one he wants (although I would find it hard to believe GNU make isn't feature-rich enough for him).

---
Know your limits.h

DOS386

11.06.2008, 00:50

@ Rugxulo

JMAKE

Post reply

> It's probably Microsoft's NMAKE.
> might (very doubtful) be able to use wmake /ms
> many free make clones: GNU/DJGPP make, DMAKE, Ladsoft's IMAKE

> But most have a different syntax.

Any is "100% compatible" ?

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Berlin, Germany,
11.06.2008, 11:38

@ DOS386

JMAKE

Post reply

> > It's probably Microsoft's NMAKE.
> > might (very doubtful) be able to use wmake /ms
> > many free make clones: GNU/DJGPP make, DMAKE, Ladsoft's IMAKE
>
> > But most have a different syntax.
>
> Any is "100% compatible" ?

Maybe Digital Mars - smake?

---
Forum admin

Japheth

Germany (South),
10.07.2008, 16:43

@ DOS386

download source for NMAKE

Post reply

> > I usually use a NMAKE.EXE, which is just stored in a tools directory
>
> Of what ? It isn't in my copy of HXSRC 2.14 :confused:

Here's one:

http://website.masm32.com/microsft.htm

---
MS-DOS forever!

Rugxulo Usono, 10.07.2008, 22:28 @ Japheth	download source for NMAKE Post reply
	> > > I usually use a NMAKE.EXE, which is just stored in a tools directory > > > > Of what ? It isn't in my copy of HXSRC 2.14 > > Here's one: > Untested, but maybe it helps. http://jrfonseca.dyndns.org/projects/gnu-win32/software/msds/nmake2make.sed