7ZA under HX (4.57 vs. 4.58 alpha 5) (DOSX)
Well, here's a good reason to use HX, you can use the Win32 .EXE of 7-Zip (e.g. 7ZA), which is compiled by MSVC and therefore a very slight bit faster than the DJGPP / GCC port (which is also awesome, though).
In fact, Mr. Pavlov recently requested benchmark tests for 4.57 vs. new 4.58 alpha 5 on his SourceForge forum, and here's my results (if you're curious).
http://www.geocities.com/snoopimeanie/7za_486.txt
http://www.geocities.com/snoopimeanie/7za_p166.txt
http://www.geocities.com/snoopimeanie/7za_p4.txt
http://www.geocities.com/snoopimeanie/7za_amd2.txt
P.S. DOS386, I already e-mailed these to him, so don't worry about it.
Complete thread:
- 7ZA under HX (4.57 vs. 4.58 alpha 5) - Rugxulo, 26.03.2008, 03:47 (DOSX)
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- 7ZA under HX (4.57 vs. 4.58 alpha 5) - swf, 30.03.2008, 05:26
- 7ZA under HX (4.57 vs. 4.58 alpha 5) - rr, 30.03.2008, 19:17
- 7ZA under HX (4.57 vs. 4.58 alpha 5) - Rugxulo, 31.03.2008, 00:40
- 7ZA under HX (4.57 vs. 4.58 alpha 5) - rr, 30.03.2008, 19:17
- 7ZA under HX (4.57 vs. 4.58 alpha 5) - swf, 30.03.2008, 05:26
Mix view