Aha! Share was a *red herring* ! Hunt over !!! (Miscellaneous)
> > This either points directly to the DOS code segment
> > or to one of the stubs in the DOS data segment. You can identify the
> stub
> > and if it's one, you have to retrieve the address that it jumps to in
> its
> > last instruction; this address points to the DOS code segment.
>
> Those stubs are NOT used and the segment therein is bogus whenever DOS=LOW
> and no XMS is loaded.
Yes. In this case, the jump at 0:C0 doesn't point to the stub. It points directly into the code segment, as I said above.
> And what if the motherf^cker of a user you have in
> mind (the one who devloads FIXWRAP) also messes with int 30 ?
No one messes with Int30.
> I chose int 27 because it leads us almost right to the point of interest
Yes it does. But if you were to use the CALL 5 entry pointer anyway it would be more convenient to use it for this purpose as well instead of tracking down the (used or unused) Int27 stub in the DOS data segment.
---
l
Complete thread:
- new HACKWRAP fix for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - Ninho, 11.12.2009, 00:17 (Miscellaneous)
- new HACKWRAP fix for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - ecm, 11.12.2009, 15:02
- new *FIXWRAP* for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - Ninho, 12.12.2009, 01:12
- FIXWRAP technical thread. News - Ninho, 12.12.2009, 16:05
- CM's questions, answered - Ninho, 12.12.2009, 18:22
- CM's questions, answered - ecm, 12.12.2009, 22:40
- CM's questions, answered - Ninho, 13.12.2009, 00:10
- CM's questions, answered - ecm, 13.12.2009, 00:51
- CM's questions, answered - Ninho, 13.12.2009, 10:32
- CM's questions, answered - ecm, 13.12.2009, 00:51
- CM's questions, answered - Ninho, 13.12.2009, 00:10
- CM's questions, answered - geoffchappell, 14.12.2009, 10:42
- CM's questions, answered - Ninho, 14.12.2009, 12:19
- CM's questions, answered - ecm, 12.12.2009, 22:40
- CM's questions, answered - Ninho, 12.12.2009, 18:22
- new HACKWRAP fix for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - geoffchappell, 14.12.2009, 10:41
- new HACKWRAP fix for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - Ninho, 14.12.2009, 11:49
- new HACKWRAP fix for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - geoffchappell, 15.12.2009, 16:55
- new HACKWRAP fix for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - Ninho, 15.12.2009, 19:08
- new HACKWRAP fix for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - Ninho, 17.12.2009, 16:35
- new HACKWRAP fix for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - geoffchappell, 15.12.2009, 16:55
- new HACKWRAP fix for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - Ninho, 14.12.2009, 11:49
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - Ninho, 14.12.2009, 20:37
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - ecm, 14.12.2009, 23:30
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - Ninho, 15.12.2009, 00:59
- Aha! Share was a *red herring* ! Hunt over !!! - Ninho, 15.12.2009, 10:32
- Aha! Share was a *red herring* ! Hunt over !!! - ecm, 15.12.2009, 21:13
- Aha! Share was a *red herring* ! Hunt over !!! - Ninho, 15.12.2009, 22:32
- Aha! Share was a *red herring* ! Hunt over !!! - ecm, 15.12.2009, 23:05
- Aha! Share was a *red herring* ! Hunt over !!! - Ninho, 15.12.2009, 22:32
- Aha! Share was a *red herring* ! Hunt over !!! - ecm, 15.12.2009, 21:13
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - geoffchappell, 15.12.2009, 16:56
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - ecm, 15.12.2009, 21:19
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - Ninho, 15.12.2009, 22:38
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - ecm, 15.12.2009, 23:06
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - Ninho, 16.12.2009, 09:22
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - ecm, 15.12.2009, 23:06
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - Ninho, 15.12.2009, 22:38
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - Ninho, 16.12.2009, 20:24
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - Ninho, 30.12.2009, 10:50
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - ecm, 15.12.2009, 21:19
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - Ninho, 16.12.2009, 19:51
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - ecm, 17.12.2009, 16:19
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - Ninho, 17.12.2009, 17:14
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - ecm, 17.12.2009, 20:32
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - Ninho, 17.12.2009, 21:05
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - ecm, 17.12.2009, 21:13
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - Ninho, 17.12.2009, 23:16
- digression : MSDOS 7 and SHARE.EXE revisited - Ninho, 18.12.2009, 13:04
- digression : MSDOS 7 and SHARE.EXE revisited - ecm, 18.12.2009, 14:31
- digression : MSDOS 7 and SHARE.EXE revisited - Ninho, 18.12.2009, 17:19
- digression : MSDOS 7 and SHARE.EXE revisited - ecm, 18.12.2009, 18:19
- digression : MSDOS 7 and SHARE.EXE revisited - Ninho, 18.12.2009, 18:55
- digression : MSDOS 7 and SHARE.EXE revisited - ecm, 18.12.2009, 18:19
- digression : MSDOS 7 and SHARE.EXE revisited - Ninho, 18.12.2009, 17:19
- digression : MSDOS 7 and SHARE.EXE revisited - ecm, 18.12.2009, 14:31
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - ecm, 17.12.2009, 21:13
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - Ninho, 17.12.2009, 21:05
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - ecm, 17.12.2009, 20:32
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - Ninho, 17.12.2009, 17:14
- the algorithm, sketched for review. Nitpicks ? - ecm, 17.12.2009, 16:19
- the DOS code segment hunt, results/questions - ecm, 14.12.2009, 23:30
- HACKWRAP.SYS news, testing - Ninho, 20.12.2009, 02:44
- FIXWRAP.SYS 0.5 beta - released - please try it ! - Ninho, 23.12.2009, 00:07
- new HACKWRAP fix for MS-DOS7+, aka smashing the bug - ecm, 11.12.2009, 15:02