DOS ain't dead

swapping for HDPMI32? GCC (DOSX)

posted by DOS386, 13.08.2007, 07:14

> Of course, CWSDPMI really only implemented it because (last I heard) it
> started on such old machines (386) w/ low memory that it was sorely needed
> in order to compile most C++ apps.

Badly designed GCC relied on it on Loonix so DGJPP1 implemented it as well ... later CWSDPMI ... and it became the absolute default for all DGJPP applications

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Complete thread:

• swapping for HDPMI32? - Laaca, 11.08.2007, 15:28 (DOSX)
  • swapping for HDPMI32? - Rugxulo, 11.08.2007, 22:56
    • swapping for HDPMI32? GCC - DOS386, 13.08.2007, 07:14
      • swapping for HDPMI32? GCC - rr, 13.08.2007, 10:16
        • swapping for HDPMI32? GCC - DOS386, 16.08.2007, 09:53
  • swapping for HDPMI32? - Japheth, 12.08.2007, 16:19
  • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - DOS386, 13.08.2007, 07:32
    • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 13.08.2007, 10:17
      • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 13.08.2007, 11:42
        • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 13.08.2007, 11:52
          • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 13.08.2007, 23:19
            • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 14.08.2007, 09:24
              • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 14.08.2007, 22:29
                • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 15.08.2007, 09:40
                  • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 15.08.2007, 14:46
                    • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 16.08.2007, 20:51
                      • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 17.08.2007, 11:54
                        • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 17.08.2007, 20:05
                • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( UTF-16 NO - DOS386, 16.08.2007, 09:46