DOS ain't dead

swapping for HDPMI32? GCC (DOSX)

posted by DOS386, 16.08.2007, 09:53

> you ever design a real compiler? If not, then don't tell, that GCC is designed badly

It's not trivial at all to design a compiler of 20 languages, 20 CPU's and 40 OS'es (incl. "OS"'es)

OTOH using temp files at application level instead of hogging huge amount of "memory" from the "kernel" would have been extremely trivial compared to this

> It's called DJGPP.

Yeah ... the "natural" alphabetical sortorder

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Complete thread:

• swapping for HDPMI32? - Laaca, 11.08.2007, 15:28 (DOSX)
  • swapping for HDPMI32? - Rugxulo, 11.08.2007, 22:56
    • swapping for HDPMI32? GCC - DOS386, 13.08.2007, 07:14
      • swapping for HDPMI32? GCC - rr, 13.08.2007, 10:16
        • swapping for HDPMI32? GCC - DOS386, 16.08.2007, 09:53
  • swapping for HDPMI32? - Japheth, 12.08.2007, 16:19
  • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - DOS386, 13.08.2007, 07:32
    • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 13.08.2007, 10:17
      • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 13.08.2007, 11:42
        • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 13.08.2007, 11:52
          • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 13.08.2007, 23:19
            • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 14.08.2007, 09:24
              • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 14.08.2007, 22:29
                • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 15.08.2007, 09:40
                  • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 15.08.2007, 14:46
                    • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 16.08.2007, 20:51
                      • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 17.08.2007, 11:54
                        • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 17.08.2007, 20:05
                • swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( UTF-16 NO - DOS386, 16.08.2007, 09:46