DOS ain't dead - swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-(

swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( (DOSX)

posted by rr , Berlin, Germany, 13.08.2007, 10:17

> > There can be unpredictable results in case when application
> > tries to allocate more memory than is available.
>
> The results are pretty predictable and range from "desperately slow" to
> "unusably slow" :-(

No, that's only half the truth.

---
Forum admin

Post reply

Complete thread:

swapping for HDPMI32? - Laaca, 11.08.2007, 15:28 (DOSX)
- swapping for HDPMI32? - Rugxulo, 11.08.2007, 22:56
  - swapping for HDPMI32? GCC - DOS386, 13.08.2007, 07:14
    - swapping for HDPMI32? GCC - rr, 13.08.2007, 10:16
      - swapping for HDPMI32? GCC - DOS386, 16.08.2007, 09:53
- swapping for HDPMI32? - Japheth, 12.08.2007, 16:19
- swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - DOS386, 13.08.2007, 07:32
  - swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 13.08.2007, 10:17
    - swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 13.08.2007, 11:42
      - swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 13.08.2007, 11:52
        swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 13.08.2007, 23:19
        swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 14.08.2007, 09:24
        swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 14.08.2007, 22:29
        swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 15.08.2007, 09:40
        swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 15.08.2007, 14:46
        swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 16.08.2007, 20:51
        swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - rr, 17.08.2007, 11:54
        swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( - Japheth, 17.08.2007, 20:05
        swapping for HDPMI32? NO :-( UTF-16 NO - DOS386, 16.08.2007, 09:46