DOS ain't dead

since it works perfectly .. never change a running system ? (Developers)

posted by Japheth , Germany (South), 20.02.2008, 08:16

> YES. You are just confirming that those bring nothing but trouble and
> supplying one reason why I don't like them "too much"

They exist and they are - still - used. That's what matters.

> Does it refuse to run for you ? "Need 80386"

If I single-step thru it with DEBUG in NTVDM - yes! The NT flag might get lost if an IRQ happens ... or just for exception 01 ... almost impossible to tell.

---
MS-DOS forever!

Complete thread:

• [BUG] Criminal Mark-related bug | DPMIST32.BIN/PESTUB/ VALX - DOS386, 24.01.2008, 02:21 (Developers)
  • [BUG] Criminal Mark-related bug | DPMIST32.BIN/PESTUB/ VALX - Japheth, 24.01.2008, 06:05
    • since it works perfectly .. never change a running system ? - DOS386, 19.02.2008, 01:41
      • since it works perfectly .. never change a running system ? - Japheth, 19.02.2008, 19:21
        • since it works perfectly .. never change a running system ? - DOS386, 20.02.2008, 01:45
          • since it works perfectly .. never change a running system ? - Japheth, 20.02.2008, 08:16
          • since it works perfectly .. never change a running system ? - Japheth, 21.02.2008, 10:22
    • SnglFault ->DblFault ->TripleFault -> BOOM - unavoidable ? - DOS386, 19.02.2008, 02:00
      • SnglFault ->DblFault ->TripleFault -> BOOM - unavoidable ? - Japheth, 20.02.2008, 10:51
        • SnglFault ->DblFault ->TripleFault -> BOOM - unavoidable ? - DOS386, 21.02.2008, 02:33
          • SnglFault ->DblFault ->TripleFault -> BOOM - unavoidable ? - Japheth, 21.02.2008, 07:05
            • SnglFault ->DblFault ->TripleFault -> BOOM - unavoidable ? - DOS386, 22.02.2008, 03:09
  • [BUG] Criminal Mark-related bug | DPMIST32.BIN/PESTUB/ VALX - Laaca, 24.01.2008, 07:33
  • [BUG] Criminal Mark-related bug | DPMIST32.BIN/PESTUB/ VALX - rr, 24.01.2008, 08:18
    • [BUG] Criminal Mark-related bug | DPMIST32.BIN/PESTUB/ VALX - DOS386, 19.02.2008, 01:30