C vs. ASM (size vs speed) (Developers)
> (And to dispel another myth: if GCC is always better than assembly
> optimization, then why is GCC compiled by itself so slow??)
http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/03-11-086
Complete thread:
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 01.04.2009, 20:46 (Developers)
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - marcov, 01.04.2009, 23:28
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 02.04.2009, 00:20
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 04.04.2009, 18:38
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 04.04.2009, 20:10
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 04.04.2009, 22:23
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 05.04.2009, 23:47
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 06.04.2009, 01:25
- 65536 byte text files - ecm, 06.04.2009, 19:23
- 65536 byte text files - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:01
- 65536 byte text files - ecm, 07.04.2009, 00:14
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:27
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 07.04.2009, 13:20
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 13:35
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 08.04.2009, 10:33
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 08.04.2009, 19:24
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - RayeR, 08.04.2009, 21:09
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - rr, 08.04.2009, 21:16
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 01:11
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - RayeR, 09.04.2009, 23:15
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - Rugxulo, 10.04.2009, 05:02
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - RayeR, 10.04.2009, 14:05
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - Rugxulo, 10.04.2009, 05:02
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - RayeR, 09.04.2009, 23:15
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 08.04.2009, 21:44
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 00:55
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 09.04.2009, 09:09
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 14:14
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 09.04.2009, 21:17
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 21:38
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 10.04.2009, 10:16
- EZ-GCC v2 for 386 (1.2 MB 5.25" FD) - Rugxulo, 16.04.2009, 18:38
- EZ-GCC v2 for 386, GNU Emacs 23.0.95 pretest - Rugxulo, 05.07.2009, 21:22
- GNU Emacs 23.0.96 pretest (last one!) - Rugxulo, 16.07.2009, 06:07
- GNU Emacs 23.1 - Rugxulo, 11.09.2009, 06:54
- GNU Emacs 23.0.96 pretest (last one!) - Rugxulo, 16.07.2009, 06:07
- EZ-GCC v2 for 386, GNU Emacs 23.0.95 pretest - Rugxulo, 05.07.2009, 21:22
- EZ-GCC v2 for 386 (1.2 MB 5.25" FD) - Rugxulo, 16.04.2009, 18:38
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 10.04.2009, 10:16
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 21:38
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 09.04.2009, 21:17
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 14:14
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 09.04.2009, 09:09
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 00:55
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - RayeR, 08.04.2009, 21:09
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 08.04.2009, 19:24
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 08.04.2009, 10:33
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 13:35
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 07.04.2009, 13:20
- C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:27
- 65536 byte text files - ecm, 07.04.2009, 00:14
- 65536 byte text files - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:01
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:00
- 65536 byte text files - ecm, 06.04.2009, 19:23
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 06.04.2009, 01:25
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 05.04.2009, 23:47
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 04.04.2009, 22:23
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 04.04.2009, 20:10
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 04.04.2009, 18:38
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 02.04.2009, 00:20
- GNU Emacs 23.0.92 pretest (DJGPP) - Rugxulo, 04.04.2009, 20:38
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (23.0.92 "pretest") - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 21:40
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - marcov, 01.04.2009, 23:28