DOS ain't dead - C vs. ASM (size vs speed)

C vs. ASM (size vs speed) (Developers)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 09.04.2009, 21:38

> > In theory, since you don't still have that 386 (right?), if you
> > "downgraded" to 2.8.1 or 2.7.2.3, removed AR.EXE, and used UHarc, etc.,
> > you could probably fit it in 1.2 MB.
>
> Well, but that is removing functionality? Can't you just remove some
> bloat, but keep functionality?

Maybe. BTW, the only thing 2.8.1 has over 2.7.2.3 is wimpy 586 optimizations and stabs debug info, not exactly useful for a 386, is it?

> And yes, I might still have that mobo somewhere. (with a SX20 soldered on
> it)

I'm honestly not sure why I included AR.EXE at all, but I guess I figured some people might find libraries more convenient (and some makefiles require it). I'm sure I could remove some of the superfluous DPMI servers and stick with good ol' CWSDPMI r5.

Does the 386 have a VGA? If not, I should remove the 4k tiny EZEDIT. (And even then that was a bonus. I assume most people have their own preferred editors.)

EDIT: Did I mention that 2.7.2.3 is a billion times easier to build than later versions? Heck, I was able to build it on my P166 with SFNs only (!) in ten minutes. And the sources are only like 6 MB .tar.bz2'd (unlike billion megs later, probably mostly due to more frontends). :-)

Post reply

Complete thread:

GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 01.04.2009, 20:46 (Developers)
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - marcov, 01.04.2009, 23:28
  - GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 02.04.2009, 00:20
    - GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 04.04.2009, 18:38
      - GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 04.04.2009, 20:10
        GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 04.04.2009, 22:23
        GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 05.04.2009, 23:47
        GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 06.04.2009, 01:25
        65536 byte text files - ecm, 06.04.2009, 19:23
        65536 byte text files - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:01
        65536 byte text files - ecm, 07.04.2009, 00:14
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:27
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 07.04.2009, 13:20
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 13:35
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 08.04.2009, 10:33
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 08.04.2009, 19:24
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - RayeR, 08.04.2009, 21:09
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - rr, 08.04.2009, 21:16
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 01:11
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - RayeR, 09.04.2009, 23:15
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - Rugxulo, 10.04.2009, 05:02
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - RayeR, 10.04.2009, 14:05
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 08.04.2009, 21:44
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 00:55
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 09.04.2009, 09:09
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 14:14
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 09.04.2009, 21:17
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 21:38
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 10.04.2009, 10:16
        EZ-GCC v2 for 386 (1.2 MB 5.25" FD) - Rugxulo, 16.04.2009, 18:38
        EZ-GCC v2 for 386, GNU Emacs 23.0.95 pretest - Rugxulo, 05.07.2009, 21:22
        GNU Emacs 23.0.96 pretest (last one!) - Rugxulo, 16.07.2009, 06:07
        GNU Emacs 23.1 - Rugxulo, 11.09.2009, 06:54
        GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:00
- GNU Emacs 23.0.92 pretest (DJGPP) - Rugxulo, 04.04.2009, 20:38
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (23.0.92 "pretest") - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 21:40