Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

Source code of Jack's drivers IS free, but Japheth fears it (Announce)

posted by lucho, 27.09.2007, 18:27

> In *my* humble opinion it is a bit strange if someone who illegally
> distributes an MS-DOS "clone" requires ethically thinking from somebody
> else. As for me, I won't talk to Mr. Ellis. But no need to worry, I won't
> use his source then ... and this issue has very low priority. However,
> since the source apparently is NOT free (at least not in the sense I
> understand freedom), it might be a good idea to clarify the conditions
> when and how to use it in the readme.txt.

What "clone" do you mean? LZ-DOS? Have you read that its free to use and convey? As to Jack Ellis, you obviously fear his new source code, which is free, by the way - so if you can't understand it, please find a better excuse not to use it than falsely calling it "non-free"!

> I am not a lawyer, and I have no wish to be one. Anybody is
> "free" to use the source files for the UDMA/UDVD/XMGR drivers
> any way they wish. I hope THAT is clear-enough for you all.

The above was written by him at http://www.mail-archive.com/freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg06151.html

> > UDMA/XMGR makes XDMA/XCDROM completely obsolete
>
> No. SATA DVDs are rare, because they offer no benefits compared to PATA -
> in contrast to SATA HDs. And adding support for SATA is rather simple,
> since the API is the same.

There are other reasons why XDMA and XCDROM are obsolete, but obviously you don't understand them, or don't care about them, or both, Mr. Andreas Grech.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 253 users online (0 registered, 253 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum