Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Search:  
Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

Wrong AGAIN, FOOL!! (Announce)

posted by Jack, 29.09.2007, 17:42

> DOS was not designed for multitasking, but it exposes an API to make the
> code reusable. So a carefully written TSR might use DOS, even inside
> an ISR. But low-level drivers using a static local stack - like UDMA -
> makes this impossible.
Oh, REALLY?? How does UDMA do this?? Its static stack is in use ONLY
while it executes its OWN disk I-O requests, and at all other times your
"mythical TSR" damned-well BETTER have its OWN stack, FOOL!!

> Furthermore, there are hooks/call-outs defined for int 13h drivers
> (int 15h, ax=9000h) to support multitasking, but UDMA doesn't implement
> them either.
And it does not NEED to, since the RBIL clearly says that a MULTITASKER,
NOT the I-O drivers, must issue your Int 15h AH=90h "hooks"! Can't you
READ, FOOL??!! What possible "good" would those hooks be in any case??
UDMA does its OWN disk I-O and does NOT use any "Brat BIOS" logic, which
I long-ago learned NEVER to "trust"! Since the real BIOS does not know
about Int 13h requests that get intercepted by UDMA, your "hooks" are in
fact WORTHLESS, you Bloody FOOL!!

Why don't you STOP practicing that old U.S. joke: "If you can't WOW 'em
with brilliance, then BAFFLE 'em with BULLSH*T"! I will continue to do
as many posts with the TRUTH about all your BULLSH*T as necessary, until
people finally "see you" for the IDIOT and the CHARLATAN you really are!
Maybe you should follow Patrick Swayze's great words from our 1987 movie
"Dirty Dancing": STAY with your F***ing JEMM386 "College boy, and leave
the ROUGH stuff to me!"

Post reply
 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 242 users online (0 registered, 242 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum