Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

Yes (Announce)

posted by Japheth Homepage, Germany (South), 29.09.2007, 11:26
(edited by Japheth on 29.09.2007, 12:15)

> Yes, I have noticed how "SH*T Disturbers" like you DO behave that way,
> FOOL!
> Perhaps you might succeed in getting your "sorry ass" BANNED here, as
> well!!

Hm, yes, every now and then this board's admin loves to delete all posts, might very well be that he also decides to delete all registered users for some reasons. But I'm pretty sure that he's not so "unwise" like the "Evil DoctoR" admin who usually fought all users reporting bugs (like NTOSKRNL, me ... and Lucho! IIRC). But why talking about things of the past, in the meantime dear Udo has banned the rest of the users as well.

> since you obviously are unaware that
> DOS was never designed for and DOES NOT SUPPORT "re-entrant" I-O, FOOL!

No. DOS was not designed for multitasking, but it exposes an API to make the code reusable. So a carefully written TSR might use DOS, even inside an ISR. But low-level drivers using a static local stack - like UDMA - makes this impossible. Furthermore, there are hooks/call-outs defined for int 13h drivers (int 15h, ax=9000h) to support multitasking, but UDMA doesn't implement them either.

---
MS-DOS forever!

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 242 users online (0 registered, 242 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum