The DOS user base is much larger than you think (Miscellaneous)
> Then you should:
>
> 1. Avoid DOS
> and
> 2. Avoid DOS forums
What makes you think I don't still use DOS? The fact is, that I do. I emulate it, and I created a multi-boot USB key that includes it. I write code for it on occasion.
I'm just not delusional about the reality that:
1. It's not 'better' than most newer, and even some older OSes.
2. The active DOS user base is very, very small.
3. That it too is an MS creation, like any other.
Stick Windows 3.1 on a brand new PC, and it'll seem very fast, much closer to hardware -- and everything else will look bloated. Windows 95 probably would too, to a slightly lesser degree.
MS-DOS could've had a ~30k kernel and ~20k command.com for filesize and used up much less memory --- and that's not being very conservative at all.
> > A 900 mhz PC is "old" to me.
>
> Vi$ta/Vixta-Loonix extreme CPU/memory
> hogging crap
I don't use Vista - and only an ignorant person would say Linux is an extreme CPU/memory hog.
> Why should you waste many 100 Watt of electricity for running your 4 or 8
> cores per 64 bit in ONE PC only to prevent your great non-DOS
> kernel from becoming unusably unresponsive and taking hours to boot or
> shut down ?
My boot time is about 30 seconds - that's to an OS which has loaded drivers for my SATA, DVD, graphics card, network card and USB controllers...one that's fully multitasking and multiuser.
And even if it did take longer, it doesn't matter much:
% uptime
8:53 AM up 168 days, 23:03, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Hrmm :) awefully stable drivers.
It seems to me, based on your comments, that you're really only familiar with MS products. That's very sad.
Complete thread:
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 23:39 (Miscellaneous)
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - Steve, 18.10.2007, 08:27
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - sol, 23.10.2007, 17:41
- NO! - Jack, 23.10.2007, 21:49
- NO! - sol, 23.10.2007, 22:50
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 13:55
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 17:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 18:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 18:38
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 09:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 25.10.2007, 17:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 02:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 06:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 07:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 17:40
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:04
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 17:40
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:07
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 13:55
- 30 seconds boot time - lucho, 27.10.2007, 14:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 13:55
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 01:38
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Steve, 28.10.2007, 04:26
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 28.10.2007, 20:18
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:31
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:47
- The charm of DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:23
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:47
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:31
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 07:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 06:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 07:59
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 25.10.2007, 17:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 09:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 18:38
- The "Title" of This Thread. - Jack, 24.10.2007, 19:36
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 24.10.2007, 19:46
- Get Something ELSE!! - Jack, 24.10.2007, 22:27
- Get Something ELSE!! - sol, 24.10.2007, 23:01
- The "Title" of This Thread. - DOS386, 25.10.2007, 06:30
- The "Title" of This Thread. - rr, 25.10.2007, 10:48
- The "Title" of This Thread and the God - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:10
- The "Title" of This Thread. - Steve, 25.10.2007, 14:55
- The "Title" of This Thread. - rr, 25.10.2007, 10:48
- Boot floppy - lucho, 25.10.2007, 15:29
- The "Title" of This Thread. - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:00
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 28.10.2007, 20:28
- Get Something ELSE!! - Jack, 24.10.2007, 22:27
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 24.10.2007, 19:46
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 18:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - RayeR, 29.10.2007, 12:35
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:44
- Seagate and DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:24
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 19:20
- DyDOSaurs - lucho, 30.10.2007, 20:05
- DyDOSaurs - sol, 30.10.2007, 20:10
- Questions to Solomon - lucho, 31.10.2007, 10:32
- DyDOSaurs - sol, 30.10.2007, 20:10
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 21:05
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 21:47
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 22:29
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 22:34
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:48
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 02:29
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 05:01
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 14:44
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 17:26
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 14:44
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 05:01
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 02:29
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:48
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:43
- Seagate and DOS - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:51
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 01:12
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 04:35
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:47
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 01:22
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 21:47
- DyDOSaurs - lucho, 30.10.2007, 20:05
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 19:20
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - RayeR, 31.10.2007, 12:40
- Seagate and DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:24
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:44
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 17:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 13:55
- NO! - sol, 23.10.2007, 22:50
- NO! - Jack, 23.10.2007, 21:49
- One of the biggest improvements to DOS - lucho, 25.10.2007, 16:39
- One of the biggest improvements to DOS - Tom, 25.10.2007, 17:06
- Let's End THIS Poor-Old Thread, As Well! - Jack, 31.10.2007, 15:46