The DOS user base is much larger than you think (Miscellaneous)
> I don't use Vista - and only an ignorant person would say Linux is an
> extreme CPU/memory hog.
I forget what Linux distro it was, but one of 'em I saw recently (OpenSUSE? Fedora?) said "1 GB of RAM recommended". Sorry if I feel that's a little excessive. Even PuppyLinux requires 128 MB of RAM nowadays, and ReactOS needs 64 MB at minimum. Of course, that's considered excellent by most people. DOS is sometimes best, especially for recycled PCs. No, you don't need it if you want to upgrade all your hardware. And no, it doesn't support everything (due to lack of developers). But it works for our purposes, so we use it (as well as others, too).
> My boot time is about 30 seconds - that's to an OS which has loaded
> drivers for my SATA, DVD, graphics card, network card and USB
> controllers...one that's fully multitasking and multiuser.
Ah yes, the wonderful complexity of multiuser, permissions, symlinks, multitasking, threads, Unicode, networking protocols, tons of configuration files, dynamic linking, GUIs, etc. But DOS can do most of that, anyways (without forcing it down your throat).
I don't think even MS recommends shutdown / reboot anymore. Sleep/Standby and Hibernation (plus ReadyBoost) are what they suggest to speed things up.
P.S. You must have a really fast PC because most OSes (even Damn Small Linux) don't boot up in less than 1.5 mins.
> And even if it did take longer, it doesn't matter much:
>
> % uptime
> 8:53 AM up 168 days, 23:03, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
>
> Hrmm :) awefully stable drivers.
You never did tell everyone (else) what your favorite OS is.
---
Know your limits.h
Complete thread:
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 23:39 (Miscellaneous)
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - Steve, 18.10.2007, 08:27
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - sol, 23.10.2007, 17:41
- NO! - Jack, 23.10.2007, 21:49
- NO! - sol, 23.10.2007, 22:50
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 13:55
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 17:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 18:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 18:38
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 09:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 25.10.2007, 17:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 02:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 06:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 07:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 17:40
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:04
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 17:40
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:07
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 13:55
- 30 seconds boot time - lucho, 27.10.2007, 14:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 13:55
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 01:38
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Steve, 28.10.2007, 04:26
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 28.10.2007, 20:18
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:31
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:47
- The charm of DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:23
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:47
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:31
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 07:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 06:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 07:59
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 25.10.2007, 17:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 09:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 18:38
- The "Title" of This Thread. - Jack, 24.10.2007, 19:36
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 24.10.2007, 19:46
- Get Something ELSE!! - Jack, 24.10.2007, 22:27
- Get Something ELSE!! - sol, 24.10.2007, 23:01
- The "Title" of This Thread. - DOS386, 25.10.2007, 06:30
- The "Title" of This Thread. - rr, 25.10.2007, 10:48
- The "Title" of This Thread and the God - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:10
- The "Title" of This Thread. - Steve, 25.10.2007, 14:55
- The "Title" of This Thread. - rr, 25.10.2007, 10:48
- Boot floppy - lucho, 25.10.2007, 15:29
- The "Title" of This Thread. - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:00
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 28.10.2007, 20:28
- Get Something ELSE!! - Jack, 24.10.2007, 22:27
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 24.10.2007, 19:46
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 18:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - RayeR, 29.10.2007, 12:35
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:44
- Seagate and DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:24
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 19:20
- DyDOSaurs - lucho, 30.10.2007, 20:05
- DyDOSaurs - sol, 30.10.2007, 20:10
- Questions to Solomon - lucho, 31.10.2007, 10:32
- DyDOSaurs - sol, 30.10.2007, 20:10
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 21:05
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 21:47
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 22:29
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 22:34
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:48
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 02:29
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 05:01
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 14:44
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 17:26
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 14:44
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 05:01
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 02:29
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:48
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:43
- Seagate and DOS - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:51
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 01:12
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 04:35
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:47
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 01:22
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 21:47
- DyDOSaurs - lucho, 30.10.2007, 20:05
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 19:20
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - RayeR, 31.10.2007, 12:40
- Seagate and DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:24
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:44
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 17:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 13:55
- NO! - sol, 23.10.2007, 22:50
- NO! - Jack, 23.10.2007, 21:49
- One of the biggest improvements to DOS - lucho, 25.10.2007, 16:39
- One of the biggest improvements to DOS - Tom, 25.10.2007, 17:06
- Let's End THIS Poor-Old Thread, As Well! - Jack, 31.10.2007, 15:46