The DOS user base is much larger than you think (Miscellaneous)
> I like to code programs/websites while I listen to music. I like to
> compile/view them without exiting my editor. I like to download my
> favorite TV shows with bittorrent while I'm doing this.
You can compile programs w/ error msgs, + view the screen output w/o leaving the editor. Just use VIM, FED, GNU Emacs, FED, FASMD, RHIDE, SETEDIT, etc.
Music? Any CD audio player (e.g. SJGPlay or Eric's CDROM2) should let you listen in the background. In fact, most module players and Mpxplay (with tweaking of DOS/32A) will let you go about your business too.
And I know you know that DR-DOS (among other more obscure: Real32?? ZDOS??) multitasks fine. Granted, most people coding for DOS don't use pthreads or Ruby's green threads. In fact, I'm still waiting for a decent example for MT (guess I'll have to modify DISKCOPY, sounds like a good candidate IMO). And don't make me mention Win 3.x as a good multitasker. It sorta works (barely), at least. (Oh, and DesqView, duh.) Most of that isn't "free", though.
> Maybe take a break and watch the TV shows or browse the web without
> closing all of this stuff so I can start right back up again where I left
> off when I'm done instead of having to re-open everything and find the
> places I was in before.
VIM (:mksession) and TDE (Alt-Shift-W) allow you to save your sessions / workspaces. So you don't have to worry about losing your place.
Watch tv shows? Bah. Just watch .FLI or .ANI instead.
Actually, DOS386 reported getting an older GNASH working with HX.
There's also DUGL Player and MPLAYER and Display for DOS.
I'm sure you've also heard of Quickview.
> I like to be able to run an httpd server with SSL so that friends can
> login and see what I'm working on --- and an instant messenger so I can
> give them the url + passwords.
DOS Lynx w/ SSL support is here.
leetIRC and WebServ are here.
Jaffa and Toffee are here.
SSH, SCP, SFTP are here.
> I like to have OS level partition encryption to protect client
> information.
Fun fun fun. Actually, we have encryption in DOS too. See this.
> I like to make use of my obscure network and sound cards. I like to have
> logging in the background, so if something goes wrong I know what
> happened, even if I'm not here.
Okay, it's true, DOS sucks at SB Live! because nobody (except LMP or Mpxplay) supports it. This will eventually be fixed (I hope).
> I want automated backups to store to an external USB hard disk at 3 am,
> even if I'm still up using my PC, doing all the things mentioned above.
Bah, stable modern OSes shouldn't need backups with all their uber-security.
> Why should they? What's DOS got to offer?
Fun.
> A 900 mhz PC is "old" to me. Why would I waste the electricity and create
> the additional ozone running a second PC --- when it can't offer me
> anything running DOS than this one already does?
Have you seen the decTOP?
And a final note: FreeDOS is technically a newer OS than GNU/Linux, BSD, Windows, etc. And it has less developers. So don't blame FreeDOS, blame everyone who isn't helping!
Complete thread:
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 23:39 (Miscellaneous)
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - Steve, 18.10.2007, 08:27
- Only One "Customer" -- ONLY ONE!!! - sol, 23.10.2007, 17:41
- NO! - Jack, 23.10.2007, 21:49
- NO! - sol, 23.10.2007, 22:50
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 13:55
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 17:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 18:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 18:38
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 09:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 25.10.2007, 17:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 02:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 06:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 07:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 17:40
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:04
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 17:40
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:07
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 13:55
- 30 seconds boot time - lucho, 27.10.2007, 14:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 13:55
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 18:05
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 01:38
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Steve, 28.10.2007, 04:26
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 28.10.2007, 20:18
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:31
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:47
- The charm of DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:23
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:47
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:31
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 07:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 06:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:42
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 07:59
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 25.10.2007, 17:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 25.10.2007, 09:16
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 18:38
- The "Title" of This Thread. - Jack, 24.10.2007, 19:36
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 24.10.2007, 19:46
- Get Something ELSE!! - Jack, 24.10.2007, 22:27
- Get Something ELSE!! - sol, 24.10.2007, 23:01
- The "Title" of This Thread. - DOS386, 25.10.2007, 06:30
- The "Title" of This Thread. - rr, 25.10.2007, 10:48
- The "Title" of This Thread and the God - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:10
- The "Title" of This Thread. - Steve, 25.10.2007, 14:55
- The "Title" of This Thread. - rr, 25.10.2007, 10:48
- Boot floppy - lucho, 25.10.2007, 15:29
- The "Title" of This Thread. - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:00
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 28.10.2007, 20:28
- Get Something ELSE!! - Jack, 24.10.2007, 22:27
- The "Title" of This Thread. - sol, 24.10.2007, 19:46
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 18:27
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - RayeR, 29.10.2007, 12:35
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:44
- Seagate and DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:24
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 19:20
- DyDOSaurs - lucho, 30.10.2007, 20:05
- DyDOSaurs - sol, 30.10.2007, 20:10
- Questions to Solomon - lucho, 31.10.2007, 10:32
- DyDOSaurs - sol, 30.10.2007, 20:10
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 21:05
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 21:47
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 22:29
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 30.10.2007, 22:34
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:48
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 02:29
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 05:01
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 14:44
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 17:26
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 14:44
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 05:01
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 02:29
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:48
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:43
- Seagate and DOS - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:51
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 01:12
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 31.10.2007, 04:35
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 22:47
- Seagate and DOS - Khusraw, 31.10.2007, 01:22
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 21:47
- DyDOSaurs - lucho, 30.10.2007, 20:05
- Seagate and DOS - sol, 30.10.2007, 19:20
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - RayeR, 31.10.2007, 12:40
- Seagate and DOS - lucho, 30.10.2007, 17:24
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:44
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - sol, 24.10.2007, 17:43
- The DOS user base is much larger than you think - lucho, 24.10.2007, 13:55
- NO! - sol, 23.10.2007, 22:50
- NO! - Jack, 23.10.2007, 21:49
- One of the biggest improvements to DOS - lucho, 25.10.2007, 16:39
- One of the biggest improvements to DOS - Tom, 25.10.2007, 17:06
- Let's End THIS Poor-Old Thread, As Well! - Jack, 31.10.2007, 15:46