Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

RxDOS | C vs ASM | purism | empty RX at SF ? (Announce)

posted by DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:09

> I don't know the word "wimpy" but at the time DOS-C was chosen to be the
> FreeDOS kernel, it was probably "buggier" than RxDOS.

Maybe ... first I wonder whether RX was already available at that time under the GPL ... is YES, then DOS-C was chosen because of a sort of C-purism only ?

> (And BTW, the SourceForge page doesn't have any files, even in CVS!)

I did find them :clap:

> Maybe we should test it and see what doesn't work??
> At least then we could compile a compatibility list.

See www.drdos.org

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 252 users online (0 registered, 252 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum