Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? (Announce)
> But what is the actual advantage for prohibiting open source software with
> MASM? I mean, one way I can use MASM, and the other way I can't. Neither
> way hurts them. In fact, that's what programming tools are for: to create
> and share stuff. So, this boggles the mind. Oh well, less MASM users, more
> NASM/FASM users as a result. If ?? (whoever) doesn't see that as their
> loss, then too bad for them.
Open source does hurt Microsoft - in fact, it's Microsoft's largest threat. Microsoft can't fight against 'free' - there's no company behind it to threaten, sue, buy out or make big deals with. The software can simply be forked and continued.
While Microsoft's software gets filled with anti-consumer features like DRM and slows down, open source software tends to be getting better.
What do you think happens when someone switches to something like OpenOffice? Even if it's a dozen people a day --- they don't tend to switch back. They get over their fears and say "hrm, wow, this is actually pretty good...and it didn't cost me a thing."
If it wasn't worth using free over buying MS Office --- no loss, they didn't spend a thing. In a year when "omg brand new OpenOffice 3.0" comes out, they'll try it again and maybe permanently switch. Microsoft has no way of attracting these people back, unless they offer their products free, which doesn't work for them.
Complete thread:
- Jack's drivers updated - Laaca, 13.10.2007, 13:48 (Announce)
- Corrected UIDE Coming. - Jack, 13.10.2007, 16:56
- Jack's drivers updated - Japheth, 14.10.2007, 11:17
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:35
- Clarification - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:41
- MASM 5.10 - rr, 15.10.2007, 12:54
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:23
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - rr, 15.10.2007, 20:57
- Open source development prohibited with MA$M32 ?!? - DOS386, 16.10.2007, 01:53
- Open source development prohibited with MA$M32 ?!? - rr, 16.10.2007, 09:51
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Steve, 16.10.2007, 13:35
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 19:31
- Steve Hutchesson's weird "MASM32" licence - lucho, 16.10.2007, 19:44
- Steve Hutchesson's weird "MASM32" licence - Rugxulo, 17.10.2007, 01:33
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 29.10.2007, 17:12
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 30.10.2007, 05:23
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:55
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:37
- Open source development NOT prohibited with MASM! - lucho, 31.10.2007, 20:24
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:55
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 30.10.2007, 05:23
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - Jack, 15.10.2007, 18:51
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - lucho, 15.10.2007, 19:07
- don't worry - Rugxulo, 15.10.2007, 19:56
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - Japheth, 15.10.2007, 23:02
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - lucho, 15.10.2007, 19:07
- Still "Linked", I See! - Jack, 15.10.2007, 20:22
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:23
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 15.10.2007, 14:55
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:18
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 14:06
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 17:44
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 18:06
- WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 18:41
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 18:06
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 17:44
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 14:06
- NOT Responsible For Other Assemblers!! - Jack, 16.10.2007, 16:11
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C - lucho, 17.10.2007, 08:47
- MASM 5.10? No! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 10:06
- DOS-C, RxDOS, EDR-DOS, MASM 5.10 - lucho, 17.10.2007, 12:24
- Quantity issues - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 12:54
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - lucho, 17.10.2007, 13:29
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 14:19
- Real DOS is still alive! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:32
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 14:19
- Quantity issues - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 17:20
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 18:21
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 18:31
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:12
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:55
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:26
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - tom, 17.10.2007, 20:33
- Efficiency still counts! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:55
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 21:08
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - tom, 17.10.2007, 20:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 21:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 21:41
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:26
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:55
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 19:48
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:33
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:12
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 18:31
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 18:21
- Quantity issues - DOS386, 24.10.2007, 02:41
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - lucho, 17.10.2007, 13:29
- PRIDE Issues!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 13:31
- Anyone Want a 1.75K UIDEJR?? - Jack, 17.10.2007, 20:09
- Quantity issues - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 12:54
- DOS-C, RxDOS, EDR-DOS, MASM 5.10 - lucho, 17.10.2007, 12:24
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - DOS386, 24.10.2007, 02:58
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - Japheth, 24.10.2007, 15:08
- RxDOS. ASM vs C kernels. Cluster alocation of FreeDOS - lucho, 24.10.2007, 15:57
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - DOS386, 25.10.2007, 06:41
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Japheth, 25.10.2007, 07:55
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Japheth, 25.10.2007, 07:55
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:15
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:18
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:20
- RxDOS - lucho, 27.10.2007, 17:35
- RxDOS - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 02:01
- RxDOS | C vs ASM | purism | empty RX at SF ? - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:09
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - lucho, 28.10.2007, 09:45
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - tom, 29.10.2007, 11:23
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:53
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - lucho, 28.10.2007, 09:45
- RxDOS - Steve, 28.10.2007, 04:57
- RxDOS | C vs ASM | purism | empty RX at SF ? - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:09
- RxDOS - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 02:01
- RxDOS - lucho, 27.10.2007, 17:35
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:20
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:18
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - Japheth, 24.10.2007, 15:08
- MASM 5.10? No! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 10:06
- "C" For Systems Work Is ... - Jack, 17.10.2007, 13:13
- Bloatware! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:27
- Please not another C vs. ASM debate! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 16:02
- Bloatware is not just "C vs. Assembler" - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:13
- Then "Keepen Zie Mouth SHUT"!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 16:09
- Please not another C vs. ASM debate! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 16:02
- "C" For Systems Work Is ... - Steve, 25.10.2007, 15:12
- Bloatware! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:27
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C - lucho, 17.10.2007, 08:47
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:18
- MASM 5.10 - Jack, 15.10.2007, 18:22
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:35
- Corrected UIDE Available. - Jack, 14.10.2007, 14:44
- Corrected UIDE Available. - lucho, 15.10.2007, 07:28