Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? (Announce)
While you might have some grounds on the fact that the wording may a little bit confusing, Steve Hutchesson has every right to make you do this.
In fact, I could write a license that states that you're only permitted to download my software while naked, and should you ever dress you must delete it.
Basically, the software is not free at all, but instead of paying for it, you must comply with the terms and conditions --- you're agreeing, when you download it, to all the terms of the license.
You can be sued for breaking copyright law if you're not in compliance.
Complete thread:
- Jack's drivers updated - Laaca, 13.10.2007, 13:48 (Announce)
- Corrected UIDE Coming. - Jack, 13.10.2007, 16:56
- Jack's drivers updated - Japheth, 14.10.2007, 11:17
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:35
- Clarification - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:41
- MASM 5.10 - rr, 15.10.2007, 12:54
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:23
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - rr, 15.10.2007, 20:57
- Open source development prohibited with MA$M32 ?!? - DOS386, 16.10.2007, 01:53
- Open source development prohibited with MA$M32 ?!? - rr, 16.10.2007, 09:51
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Steve, 16.10.2007, 13:35
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 19:31
- Steve Hutchesson's weird "MASM32" licence - lucho, 16.10.2007, 19:44
- Steve Hutchesson's weird "MASM32" licence - Rugxulo, 17.10.2007, 01:33
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 29.10.2007, 17:12
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 30.10.2007, 05:23
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:55
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 31.10.2007, 00:37
- Open source development NOT prohibited with MASM! - lucho, 31.10.2007, 20:24
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - sol, 30.10.2007, 16:55
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - Rugxulo, 30.10.2007, 05:23
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - Jack, 15.10.2007, 18:51
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - lucho, 15.10.2007, 19:07
- don't worry - Rugxulo, 15.10.2007, 19:56
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - Japheth, 15.10.2007, 23:02
- If So, DELETE Your "Links". - lucho, 15.10.2007, 19:07
- Still "Linked", I See! - Jack, 15.10.2007, 20:22
- Open source development prohibited with MASM ?!? - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:23
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 15.10.2007, 14:55
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:18
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 14:06
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 17:44
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 18:06
- WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 18:41
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 18:06
- MASM 5.10 and WASM - lucho, 16.10.2007, 17:44
- MASM 5.10 - Japheth, 16.10.2007, 14:06
- NOT Responsible For Other Assemblers!! - Jack, 16.10.2007, 16:11
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C - lucho, 17.10.2007, 08:47
- MASM 5.10? No! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 10:06
- DOS-C, RxDOS, EDR-DOS, MASM 5.10 - lucho, 17.10.2007, 12:24
- Quantity issues - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 12:54
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - lucho, 17.10.2007, 13:29
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 14:19
- Real DOS is still alive! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:32
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 14:19
- Quantity issues - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 17:20
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 18:21
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 18:31
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:12
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:55
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:26
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - tom, 17.10.2007, 20:33
- Efficiency still counts! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:55
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 21:08
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - tom, 17.10.2007, 20:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 21:33
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 21:41
- The German proverb about flies and something censored twice - lucho, 17.10.2007, 20:26
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:55
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 19:48
- Asynchronous synchronisation to ethics - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:33
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 19:12
- Hello - Khusraw, 17.10.2007, 18:31
- Hello - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 18:21
- Quantity issues - DOS386, 24.10.2007, 02:41
- 99% of DOS users run DOS in a Virtual Machine ?!? - lucho, 17.10.2007, 13:29
- PRIDE Issues!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 13:31
- Anyone Want a 1.75K UIDEJR?? - Jack, 17.10.2007, 20:09
- Quantity issues - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 12:54
- DOS-C, RxDOS, EDR-DOS, MASM 5.10 - lucho, 17.10.2007, 12:24
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - DOS386, 24.10.2007, 02:58
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - Japheth, 24.10.2007, 15:08
- RxDOS. ASM vs C kernels. Cluster alocation of FreeDOS - lucho, 24.10.2007, 15:57
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - DOS386, 25.10.2007, 06:41
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Japheth, 25.10.2007, 07:55
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 02:32
- MASM 5.10, WASM, Po-ASM, convincing "dialects" - Japheth, 25.10.2007, 07:55
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 26.10.2007, 04:15
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:18
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:20
- RxDOS - lucho, 27.10.2007, 17:35
- RxDOS - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 02:01
- RxDOS | C vs ASM | purism | empty RX at SF ? - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:09
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - lucho, 28.10.2007, 09:45
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - tom, 29.10.2007, 11:23
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - Rugxulo, 29.10.2007, 13:53
- RxDOS vs DOS-C - lucho, 28.10.2007, 09:45
- RxDOS - Steve, 28.10.2007, 04:57
- RxDOS | C vs ASM | purism | empty RX at SF ? - DOS386, 28.10.2007, 02:09
- RxDOS - Rugxulo, 28.10.2007, 02:01
- RxDOS - lucho, 27.10.2007, 17:35
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - Rugxulo, 27.10.2007, 14:20
- recompiling the FreeDOS kernel -- easy as pie - DOS386, 26.10.2007, 08:18
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C FreeDOS kernel ASM vs C - Japheth, 24.10.2007, 15:08
- MASM 5.10? No! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 10:06
- "C" For Systems Work Is ... - Jack, 17.10.2007, 13:13
- Bloatware! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:27
- Please not another C vs. ASM debate! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 16:02
- Bloatware is not just "C vs. Assembler" - lucho, 17.10.2007, 19:13
- Then "Keepen Zie Mouth SHUT"!! - Jack, 17.10.2007, 16:09
- Please not another C vs. ASM debate! - Japheth, 17.10.2007, 16:02
- "C" For Systems Work Is ... - Steve, 25.10.2007, 15:12
- Bloatware! - lucho, 17.10.2007, 14:27
- MASM 5.10, RxDOS, DOS-C - lucho, 17.10.2007, 08:47
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 15.10.2007, 18:18
- MASM 5.10 - Jack, 15.10.2007, 18:22
- MASM 5.10 - lucho, 14.10.2007, 18:35
- Corrected UIDE Available. - Jack, 14.10.2007, 14:44
- Corrected UIDE Available. - lucho, 15.10.2007, 07:28