Compatibility woes / deprecation (Miscellaneous)
> It's basically a rant from early 2002 against XP (which is nowadays
> considered one of the best Windows, or even OSes, ever by most Windows
> users).
>
> Summary:
>
> + very stable
> + good hardware compatibility
> - older commercial games don't work
> - wastes half a gig of HD space
> - pre-XP apps run worse under compatibility mode
> - shuts down much more slowly than Win9x
I agree. XP is still the most famous operating system, most people are using and liking it. Basically it would be possible to create a better operating system, but people know it and people don't like changes.
For me XP runs more stable (in sense of not bluescreening) then Win9x.
Dropping support for any pre-XP operating system is a explicable process, most developers are using XP. Whenever I could theoretically join a open source project such as watcom, firefox or whatever I wouldn't like to care what's up with Win 3.11, NT 3.5, Win9x or whatever, it's would theoretically bug me to keep care in order not to break compatibility with them as I am not using any of them. To provide multi os support for Linux is already a laudable task.
As any new windows version also Vista and probable also Windows 7 are slower then it's predecessor on the same hardware. Because I am a thrifty person I don't like to pay money for things I can do perfectly with the things I already own.
All the new innovations on past-XP desktops (from ms or from the linux world) are _really_ boring and not simplifying or more efficient or convincing me. Until today I (and most others) can still not out of the box, talk or think and le the computer understand in a efficient way and do what I want.
Ms done with XP a good job and many new netbooks (it's currently a hype) are delivered with XP because past-XP is to slow and because people who are already working with XP like it also in general more then Vista. That's why I think ms will have a very hard time in trying to kill XP. For the next 5-10 years I think I can escape buying new hardware and new Windows. XP seams now to be "the os", "the standard" and it seams it can not be dropped.
Complete thread:
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 13.02.2009, 23:38 (Miscellaneous)
- Compatibility woes / deprecation ubiquitous - Rugxulo, 13.02.2009, 23:51
- Compatibility woes / deprecation ubiquitous - rr, 14.02.2009, 18:54
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 14.02.2009, 14:02
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 14.02.2009, 14:03
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:07
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:08
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:09
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 13:55
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:55
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 12:17
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 21:26
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - ecm, 18.02.2009, 22:21
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 01:08
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 23:08
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 02:19
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 19.02.2009, 08:10
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 08:57
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 23.02.2009, 10:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 08:57
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 19.02.2009, 10:47
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 20.02.2009, 00:24
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 22.02.2009, 22:11
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 23.02.2009, 02:24
- Compatibility woes / deprecation TURBO stuff - DOS386, 24.02.2009, 05:17
- FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 07:06
- 186 or 286 - ecm, 24.02.2009, 10:46
- 186 or 286 - marcov, 24.02.2009, 11:11
- FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons bloated WATCOM - DOS386, 25.02.2009, 03:18
- FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons bloated WATCOM - Rugxulo, 25.02.2009, 09:29
- FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons bloated WATCOM - marcov, 25.02.2009, 12:58
- 186 or 286 - ecm, 24.02.2009, 10:46
- FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 07:06
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 24.02.2009, 11:32
- MS-DOS partition limits - ecm, 24.02.2009, 11:56
- MS-DOS partition limits - marcov, 24.02.2009, 18:38
- MS-DOS partition limits - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 19:29
- MS-DOS partition limits - ecm, 24.02.2009, 22:41
- MS-DOS partition limits - marcov, 24.02.2009, 18:38
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 19:46
- MS-DOS partition limits - ecm, 24.02.2009, 11:56
- Compatibility woes / deprecation TURBO stuff - DOS386, 24.02.2009, 05:17
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 23.02.2009, 02:24
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 22.02.2009, 22:11
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - DOS386, 20.02.2009, 06:08
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - marcov, 22.02.2009, 22:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - DOS386, 24.02.2009, 05:07
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - marcov, 24.02.2009, 10:40
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - DOS386, 24.02.2009, 05:07
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - marcov, 22.02.2009, 22:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 20.02.2009, 00:24
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 19.02.2009, 08:10
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 02:19
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - ecm, 18.02.2009, 22:21
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 21:26
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 12:17
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:55
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 13:55
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 13:01
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 15.02.2009, 20:47
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 16.02.2009, 12:39
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:09
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 12:44
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:26
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 15.02.2009, 20:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 16.02.2009, 12:37
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 16.02.2009, 12:32
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 17.02.2009, 01:29
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - ecm, 17.02.2009, 12:25
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 00:56
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 11:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 18.02.2009, 12:27
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 13:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 21:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 22:32
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 21:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 13:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 20:57
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 18.02.2009, 12:27
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - ecm, 17.02.2009, 12:25
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 17.02.2009, 01:29
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Matjaz, 16.02.2009, 17:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 15.02.2009, 20:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:26
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:08
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - mr, 14.02.2009, 14:03
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - RayeR, 16.02.2009, 13:52
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 20.02.2009, 22:06
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Zyzzle, 21.02.2009, 02:04
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 21.02.2009, 04:21
- Compatibility woes / deprecation ubiquitous - Rugxulo, 13.02.2009, 23:51