MS-DOS partition limits (Miscellaneous)
> > > How much storage can you use on a single HD on pure dos? 24 partitions
> > of
> > > 2GB or so?
> >
> > If "pure DOS" implies "retail MS-DOS", yes.
>
> Yes and no. I also include the w9x doses booted in dos. (so without w9x
> running).
Early versions of Win95 didn't support LBA or FAT32, I think corrected in OSR2 or so. Anyways, here's what the FreeDOS Wikipedia page says:
"FAT32 is fully supported, even booting from it. Depending on the BIOS used, as many as four LBA hard disks up to 128 GB, or even 2 TB in size are supported."
> > Note that you can't store all
> > these partitions on a single disk because retail MS-DOS never supported
> > LBA, so it accesses only the first 8 GiB of all disks. Most modern DOS
> > versions (even later MS-DOS) however support LBA and FAT32 (some even
> > support up to 32 drive letters instead of 26 ).
>
> Is there a canonical list with most important properties somewhere?
Comparison of x86 DOS OSes
Complete thread:
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 13.02.2009, 23:38 (Miscellaneous)
- Compatibility woes / deprecation ubiquitous - Rugxulo, 13.02.2009, 23:51
- Compatibility woes / deprecation ubiquitous - rr, 14.02.2009, 18:54
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 14.02.2009, 14:02
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 14.02.2009, 14:03
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:07
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:08
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:09
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 13:55
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:55
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 12:17
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 21:26
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - ecm, 18.02.2009, 22:21
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 01:08
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 23:08
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 02:19
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 19.02.2009, 08:10
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 08:57
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 23.02.2009, 10:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 08:57
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 19.02.2009, 10:47
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 20.02.2009, 00:24
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 22.02.2009, 22:11
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 23.02.2009, 02:24
- Compatibility woes / deprecation TURBO stuff - DOS386, 24.02.2009, 05:17
- FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 07:06
- 186 or 286 - ecm, 24.02.2009, 10:46
- 186 or 286 - marcov, 24.02.2009, 11:11
- FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons bloated WATCOM - DOS386, 25.02.2009, 03:18
- FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons bloated WATCOM - Rugxulo, 25.02.2009, 09:29
- FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons bloated WATCOM - marcov, 25.02.2009, 12:58
- 186 or 286 - ecm, 24.02.2009, 10:46
- FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 07:06
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 24.02.2009, 11:32
- MS-DOS partition limits - ecm, 24.02.2009, 11:56
- MS-DOS partition limits - marcov, 24.02.2009, 18:38
- MS-DOS partition limits - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 19:29
- MS-DOS partition limits - ecm, 24.02.2009, 22:41
- MS-DOS partition limits - marcov, 24.02.2009, 18:38
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 19:46
- MS-DOS partition limits - ecm, 24.02.2009, 11:56
- Compatibility woes / deprecation TURBO stuff - DOS386, 24.02.2009, 05:17
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 23.02.2009, 02:24
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 22.02.2009, 22:11
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - DOS386, 20.02.2009, 06:08
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - marcov, 22.02.2009, 22:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - DOS386, 24.02.2009, 05:07
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - marcov, 24.02.2009, 10:40
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - DOS386, 24.02.2009, 05:07
- Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - marcov, 22.02.2009, 22:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 20.02.2009, 00:24
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 19.02.2009, 08:10
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 02:19
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - ecm, 18.02.2009, 22:21
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 21:26
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 12:17
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:55
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 13:55
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 13:01
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 15.02.2009, 20:47
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 16.02.2009, 12:39
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:09
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 12:44
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:26
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 15.02.2009, 20:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 16.02.2009, 12:37
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 16.02.2009, 12:32
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 17.02.2009, 01:29
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - ecm, 17.02.2009, 12:25
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 00:56
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 11:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 18.02.2009, 12:27
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 13:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 21:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 22:32
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 21:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 13:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 20:57
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 18.02.2009, 12:27
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - ecm, 17.02.2009, 12:25
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 17.02.2009, 01:29
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Matjaz, 16.02.2009, 17:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 15.02.2009, 20:36
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:26
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:08
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - mr, 14.02.2009, 14:03
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - RayeR, 16.02.2009, 13:52
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 20.02.2009, 22:06
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Zyzzle, 21.02.2009, 02:04
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 21.02.2009, 04:21
- Compatibility woes / deprecation ubiquitous - Rugxulo, 13.02.2009, 23:51