DOS ain't dead - Compatibility woes / deprecation

Compatibility woes / deprecation (Miscellaneous)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 18.02.2009, 00:56

> According to "Undocumented DOS" older NT versions (I never used anything
> older than 5.0) even had an x86 emulator so the DOS and Win16 subsystems
> did work on non-x86 architectures. If that was the case Microsoft could've
> maintained the emulator in current versions and AMD64 Windows versions
> could still run DOS software. (Without such crap as the DOSBox's OS.)

That sounds like something I've read, too.

Anyways, here's VX32, which sounds useful:

http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/~baford/vm/

> Vx32 is a user-mode library that can be linked into arbitrary
> applications that wish to create secure, isolated execution environments
> in which to run untrusted extensions or plug-ins implemented as native
> x86 code. Vx32 is similar in purpose to the Java or .NET virtual
> machines, but it runs native x86 code, so plug-ins can be written in
> ANY language, not just Java or C#.
>
> Vx32 runs on unmodified x86 FreeBSD, Linux, and Mac OS X systems
> without special permissions, privileges, or kernel modules. It also runs
> on x86-64 Linux systems. Ports to x86-64 FreeBSD and Mac OS X should not
> be difficult. A port to Windows XP should also be possible.

Cool, eh? ;-)

---
Know your limits.h

Post reply

Complete thread:

Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 13.02.2009, 23:38 (Miscellaneous)
- Compatibility woes / deprecation ubiquitous - Rugxulo, 13.02.2009, 23:51
  - Compatibility woes / deprecation ubiquitous - rr, 14.02.2009, 18:54
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 14.02.2009, 14:02
  - Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 14.02.2009, 14:03
  - Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:07
    - Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:08
      - Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 14.02.2009, 23:09
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 13:55
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:55
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 12:17
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 21:26
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - ecm, 18.02.2009, 22:21
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 01:08
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 23:08
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 02:19
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 19.02.2009, 08:10
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 19.02.2009, 08:57
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 23.02.2009, 10:12
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 19.02.2009, 10:47
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 20.02.2009, 00:24
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 22.02.2009, 22:11
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 23.02.2009, 02:24
        Compatibility woes / deprecation TURBO stuff - DOS386, 24.02.2009, 05:17
        FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 07:06
        186 or 286 - ecm, 24.02.2009, 10:46
        186 or 286 - marcov, 24.02.2009, 11:11
        FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons bloated WATCOM - DOS386, 25.02.2009, 03:18
        FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons bloated WATCOM - Rugxulo, 25.02.2009, 09:29
        FPC: 7-Zip or UPX ; TC++ pros and cons bloated WATCOM - marcov, 25.02.2009, 12:58
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 24.02.2009, 11:32
        MS-DOS partition limits - ecm, 24.02.2009, 11:56
        MS-DOS partition limits - marcov, 24.02.2009, 18:38
        MS-DOS partition limits - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 19:29
        MS-DOS partition limits - ecm, 24.02.2009, 22:41
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 24.02.2009, 19:46
        Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - DOS386, 20.02.2009, 06:08
        Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - marcov, 22.02.2009, 22:12
        Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - DOS386, 24.02.2009, 05:07
        Compatibility woes / deprecation of UPX - marcov, 24.02.2009, 10:40
      - Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 13:01
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:36
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 15.02.2009, 20:47
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 16.02.2009, 12:39
    - Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 15.02.2009, 12:44
      - Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 15.02.2009, 20:26
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 15.02.2009, 20:36
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 16.02.2009, 12:37
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 16.02.2009, 12:32
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 17.02.2009, 01:29
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - ecm, 17.02.2009, 12:25
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 00:56
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 11:12
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Japheth, 18.02.2009, 12:27
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 13:12
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 21:36
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - marcov, 18.02.2009, 22:32
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 18.02.2009, 20:57
        Compatibility woes / deprecation - Matjaz, 16.02.2009, 17:12
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - mr, 14.02.2009, 14:03
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - RayeR, 16.02.2009, 13:52
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - rr, 20.02.2009, 22:06
- Compatibility woes / deprecation - Zyzzle, 21.02.2009, 02:04
  - Compatibility woes / deprecation - Rugxulo, 21.02.2009, 04:21