Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

AMIS, No flaming (Developers)

posted by ecm Homepage E-mail, Düsseldorf, Germany, 13.05.2011, 00:24

> I'm not sure if
> Christian feels as strongly about AMIS as I do, but I suspect he's close,
> and maybe Christian and I are the only ones who see the strategic nature of
> AMIS.

I actually might feel similarly, but I'm not going to debate endlessly about it. Having said that, I won't answer any further AMIS posts in this thread if no one specifically raises more questions or points about it here.

> IMHO, AMIS should be included as part of ALL modern TSR's and device
> drivers. There's really no good reason not to include it. The overhead
> required to support it is small compared to the benefits it provides.

In any case, even if one doesn't want AMIS, providing and/or using interrupt sharing protocol headers is still very useful. I think it's very important to point that out specifically (hence I'm repeating myself here).

Additionally, I don't agree with you about the "modern TSR's"; I'd in any case write "modern TSRs" here ;)

---
l

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 240 users online (1 registered, 239 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum