Considering MS-DOS (Users)
> As marcov hints, I'm fairly (?) certain that even MinGW Bash / MSYS needs
> Cygwin (!) due to heavy POSIX reliance. Face it, GNU is all about
> Linu^H^H^H^H POSIX.
Afaik not. Some rarer tools might only be in cygwin versions (parser generators etc) though. Basically MSys is the mingw POSIX api emulation.
What I said was that MSys is getting cygwin like aspects, and more and more tools are moved from mingw to msys only. (like said coreutils).
> Cygwin's DLL is unwieldy (large) and pretty much only "free" for open
> source stuff and sometimes slow.
I don't care for footprint issues. It simply is not well integrated with Windows. Pathwise etc.
> So people prefer MSVCRT (sadly), which is
> buggy (and non-free for redistribution). But yeah, everything since Win95
> (w/ IE?) had (some version of) MSVCRT. Still, I prefer the OpenWatcom way,
> don't need either .DLLs at all!
_some_ version being the operative word
> > Also mingw gcc runs faster. But it has some
> > tricky things like I crashed my mouth when printing 64bit ints by %lld
> and
> > msvcrt needed %I64...
Fast in one sentence with "gcc"? Brave
> Also it's a "known .DLL", part of the OS these days, so you can't
> "overload" it with a similar (better?) version. In fact, I'm not sure how
> many versions of it exist, but there are many! It's a mess. I'd strongly
> suggest avoiding it, but I guess that's not realistic since everybody uses
> it (e.g. MinGW, TCC, FreeBASIC, etc). Luckily some wise people (FreePascal)
> also avoid it!
Not everwhere. The textmode IDE has long needed cygwin. (though we are working on getting rid of that), due to its GDB inclusion.
Complete thread:
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 30.07.2011, 04:29 (Users)
- Considering MS-DOS - Japheth, 30.07.2011, 07:37
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 01:49
- Considering MS-DOS - Rugxulo, 30.07.2011, 13:52
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 01:54
- Considering DOS - DOS386, 30.07.2011, 15:17
- Considering DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 01:56
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 30.07.2011, 20:43
- Considering MS-DOS - rr, 30.07.2011, 21:57
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 30.07.2011, 22:39
- Considering MS-DOS - rr, 30.07.2011, 22:13
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 30.07.2011, 22:31
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 02:06
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 31.07.2011, 02:28
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 03:22
- Considering MS-DOS - Rugxulo, 31.07.2011, 03:50
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 04:34
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 31.07.2011, 03:53
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 04:37
- Considering MS-DOS - ron, 31.07.2011, 06:57
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 07:19
- Considering MS-DOS - ron, 31.07.2011, 08:02
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 10:40
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 31.07.2011, 17:05
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 01.08.2011, 01:39
- Considering MS-DOS - ron, 31.07.2011, 23:59
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 01.08.2011, 01:41
- Considering MS-DOS - marcov, 01.08.2011, 14:49
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 02.08.2011, 16:01
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 31.07.2011, 17:05
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 10:40
- Considering MS-DOS - ron, 31.07.2011, 08:02
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 07:19
- Considering MS-DOS - ron, 31.07.2011, 06:57
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 31.07.2011, 17:18
- Considering MS-DOS - w3a537, 02.08.2011, 10:25
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 04:37
- Considering MS-DOS - Rugxulo, 31.07.2011, 03:50
- Considering MS-DOS - paulrichards, 31.07.2011, 03:22
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 31.07.2011, 02:28
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - DOS386, 02.08.2011, 15:25
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - Dennis, 02.08.2011, 15:48
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - marcov, 02.08.2011, 18:56
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - RayeR, 02.08.2011, 19:58
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - Rugxulo, 05.08.2011, 23:06
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - RayeR, 12.08.2011, 03:09
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - Rugxulo, 05.08.2011, 23:06
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - DOS386, 04.08.2011, 11:29
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - marcov, 04.08.2011, 21:59
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - Dennis, 06.08.2011, 04:01
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - RayeR, 02.08.2011, 19:58
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - marcov, 02.08.2011, 18:56
- Considering MS-DOG (inside NTVDM) - Dennis, 02.08.2011, 15:48
- Considering MS-DOS - RayeR, 03.08.2011, 00:53
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 03.08.2011, 02:02
- Considering MS-DOS - RayeR, 03.08.2011, 12:13
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 03.08.2011, 15:34
- Considering MS-DOS - RayeR, 03.08.2011, 18:38
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 03.08.2011, 19:19
- Considering MS-DOS - RayeR, 04.08.2011, 01:24
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 04.08.2011, 04:29
- Considering MS-DOS - marcov, 04.08.2011, 08:53
- Considering MS-DOS - Rugxulo, 05.08.2011, 23:15
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 06.08.2011, 03:05
- Considering MS-DOS - Rugxulo, 06.08.2011, 04:43
- Considering MS-DOS - marcov, 06.08.2011, 13:12
- Considering MS-DOS - marcov, 06.08.2011, 13:04
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 06.08.2011, 03:05
- Considering MS-DOS - RayeR, 04.08.2011, 01:24
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 03.08.2011, 19:19
- Considering MS-DOS - RayeR, 03.08.2011, 18:38
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 04.08.2011, 04:38
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 03.08.2011, 15:34
- Considering MS-DOS - RayeR, 03.08.2011, 12:13
- Considering MS-DOS - Dennis, 03.08.2011, 02:02
- Considering MS-DOS - rr, 30.07.2011, 21:57
- Considering MS-DOS - Japheth, 30.07.2011, 07:37