HimemSX, another HimemX variant (Announce)
> > I compiled HimemSX with JWASM and it works, with interesting results.
>
> I have not tried this. Would it even work on a "lowly" 4 GB RAM laptop??
> Though it does remind me of CandyMan's similar
> EMS64 hack
> from a few years ago (2016).
>
> > I also patched the included RDISKSX.COM to allow the creation of up to a
> > 4095M ramdrive, from 2047M. Above 2048M, the ramdrive is created as
> FAT16
> > with the 64-kb cluster size. Beyond 4GB for ramdrive is impossible
> without
> > a FAT32 ramdrive for DOS and / or sector size > 512 bytes.
>
> Who was it that first supported 64 kb clusters in FAT16, was it NT 4.0?
> (Well, FAT32 wasn't added to NT until Win2k, right?)
Correct, but MS-"DOS" 7.1 does support 64-kb clusters just fine for me, as evidenced by the fact that I was able to create a 4GB ramdrive, read and write to it without errors, with a max filesize of 0x7FFFFFFF
>
> > Of course, it is impossible to write a file of >2047M because of the
> > signed 32-bit limit in filelength. Or, is there some patch to DOS
> > which will allow the creation the file to its 32-bit unsigned
> > maximum value of 4096M-1 byte?
>
> I could be wrong, but I believe Win9x (not sure when) supported 4 GB files
> in limited ways, e.g. you had to create them with int 21h, 716Ch only.
> DJGPP "beta" 2.04 had some support for this, allegedly. Unfortunately, I
> don't think NT (XP, etc.) ever supported those sizes (at least not for DOS
> APIs). Also, FreeDOS (IIRC) still doesn't either due to "signed long" bugs
> (hence max file size is still 2 GB there even on FAT32).
Yes, I remember the Win98 DOS API *does* support reading and writing of unsigned long integer filesizes between 2GB and 4GB. Why are "signed long" integers even necessary for filesize lengths? You can't have a negative filesize, so we've wasted the high bit, thereby depriving ourselves of "2-4 GB" filesizes access in DOS. I've wondered why FreeDOS hasn't fixed this bug. Implement int 21h and 716Ch access without a signed long limit. This could work even on FAT16 drives with 64-kb clusters.
Complete thread:
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 21.10.2020, 13:54 (Announce)
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - tkchia, 21.10.2020, 17:51
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - RayeR, 22.10.2020, 00:48
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Japheth, 26.10.2020, 19:32
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 27.10.2020, 06:54
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Japheth, 27.10.2020, 07:49
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 27.10.2020, 13:11
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 28.10.2020, 05:47
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Japheth, 28.10.2020, 07:06
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 28.10.2020, 23:26
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Japheth, 29.10.2020, 03:16
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 29.10.2020, 03:31
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Japheth, 31.10.2020, 02:20
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 02.11.2020, 00:31
- cwsdpmi version? Possible fix for Borland tools. - Japheth, 02.11.2020, 07:12
- cwsdpmi version? Possible fix for Borland tools. - Laaca, 02.11.2020, 19:21
- cwsdpmi version? Possible fix for Borland tools. - RayeR, 03.11.2020, 08:00
- cwsdpmi version? Possible fix for Borland tools. - Japheth, 03.11.2020, 15:11
- cwsdpmi version? Possible fix for Borland tools. - RayeR, 04.11.2020, 05:43
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - Japheth, 05.11.2020, 07:53
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - RayeR, 06.11.2020, 13:49
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - Japheth, 06.11.2020, 14:39
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - Laaca, 06.11.2020, 19:50
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - Japheth, 07.11.2020, 01:37
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - RayeR, 06.11.2020, 20:31
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - RayeR, 07.11.2020, 06:17
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - Japheth, 08.11.2020, 11:51
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - RayeR, 08.11.2020, 17:39
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - RayeR, 10.11.2020, 03:16
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - Japheth, 10.11.2020, 06:17
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - rr, 10.11.2020, 11:47
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - Japheth, 10.11.2020, 18:49
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - Rugxulo, 10.11.2020, 21:16
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - RayeR, 11.11.2020, 02:28
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - Japheth, 11.11.2020, 07:56
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - RayeR, 14.11.2020, 02:04
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - awik, 18.11.2020, 17:59
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - roytam, 17.05.2024, 19:00
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - Japheth, 11.11.2020, 07:56
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - Japheth, 10.11.2020, 06:17
- CWSDPMI r7 NOVCPI test - RayeR, 10.11.2020, 03:16
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - RayeR, 08.11.2020, 17:39
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - Laaca, 06.11.2020, 19:50
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - Japheth, 06.11.2020, 14:39
- Possible fix for cwsdpmi trouble - RayeR, 06.11.2020, 13:49
- cwsdpmi version? Possible fix for Borland tools. - Japheth, 03.11.2020, 15:11
- cwsdpmi version? Possible fix for Borland tools. - Japheth, 02.11.2020, 07:12
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 02.11.2020, 00:31
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Japheth, 31.10.2020, 02:20
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 29.10.2020, 03:31
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Japheth, 29.10.2020, 03:16
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 28.10.2020, 23:26
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Japheth, 28.10.2020, 07:06
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 28.10.2020, 05:47
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 27.10.2020, 13:11
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Japheth, 27.10.2020, 07:49
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Zyzzle, 27.10.2020, 15:14
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - RayeR, 27.10.2020, 06:54
- V86 compatibility? Yes, Jemm386 v5.8 - Japheth, 26.10.2020, 19:32
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - RayeR, 22.10.2020, 00:48
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Zyzzle, 22.10.2020, 03:38
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 22.10.2020, 06:39
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Zyzzle, 23.10.2020, 04:54
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 23.10.2020, 06:47
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Zyzzle, 23.10.2020, 14:00
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 23.10.2020, 17:32
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Laaca, 23.10.2020, 19:14
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - RayeR, 23.10.2020, 23:06
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Zyzzle, 24.10.2020, 01:52
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 24.10.2020, 05:45
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Zyzzle, 24.10.2020, 10:50
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - RayeR, 24.10.2020, 23:10
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 03.11.2020, 04:53
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - RayeR, 03.11.2020, 06:50
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - CandyMan, 05.11.2020, 19:14
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 06.11.2020, 08:33
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - RayeR, 06.11.2020, 13:37
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 03.11.2020, 04:53
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - RayeR, 24.10.2020, 23:10
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Zyzzle, 24.10.2020, 10:50
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 24.10.2020, 05:45
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Laaca, 23.10.2020, 19:14
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 23.10.2020, 17:32
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Zyzzle, 23.10.2020, 14:00
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 23.10.2020, 06:47
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Zyzzle, 23.10.2020, 04:54
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Rugxulo, 22.10.2020, 20:31
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Zyzzle, 23.10.2020, 04:37
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - RayeR, 23.10.2020, 23:13
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - marcov, 24.10.2020, 01:07
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Zyzzle, 23.10.2020, 04:37
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - Japheth, 22.10.2020, 06:39
- HimemSX Issues - Khusraw, 22.10.2020, 21:52
- HimemSX Issues - Japheth, 23.10.2020, 05:04
- HimemSX, another HimemX variant - tkchia, 21.10.2020, 17:51