SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) (DOSX)
> HDPMI does it.
Evidence, please
;*** server initialization when first client starts
;--- DS=DGROUP, ES=FLAT
@ResetTrace
_init2server_pm proc near
pushad
assume ds:DGROUP
@strout <"#init2server_pm enter",lf>
if _LTRACE_
test fMode, FM_CLONE
jz @F
@waitesckey
@@:
endif
test byte ptr dwFeatures+3, 2 ; Is SSE supported?
jz @F
@mov_eax_cr4
or ah,2 ; or ah,2 -> or ax,$0200 -> bit 9
@mov_cr4_eax
@@:
if ?KDSUPP
if ?EARLYDBGINIT eq 0
call initdebugger_pm
endif
endif
Less beautiful (but working):
;--- the lgdt,sgdt,lidt and sidt opcodes
;--- are CS Default bit dependant!
;--- in 16bit code segments the highest byte of the address
;--- is *not* loaded without prefix 66h!
@lgdt macro x
db 66h
lgdt x
endm
@sgdt macro x
db 66h
sgdt x
endm
@lidt macro x
db 66h
lidt x
endm
@sidt macro x
db 66h
sidt x
endm
@mov_eax_cr4 macro
; mov eax, cr4
db 0Fh,20h,0E0h
endm
@mov_cr4_eax macro
; mov cr4, eax
db 0Fh,22h,0E0h
endm
@cpuid macro
; cpuid
db 0Fh,0A2h
endm
But seems I found a (critical/criminal) bug:
Additionally, some privileged opcodes are emulated:
- HLT (F4)
- MOV reg,CRx (0F 20 xx) - using ESP for <reg> will not work!
- MOV CRx,reg (0F 22 xx) - using ESP for <reg> will not work!
but
?CMPCR3 = 1 ;std 1: 1=improves performance by 2-3%
?EMUMOVREGCRX = 1 ;std 1: emulate mov reg, crX (req. by 32rtm!)
?EMUMOVCRXREG = 1 ;std 1: emulate mov crX, reg
?EMUMOVCR0REG = 0 ;std 0: emulate mov cr0, reg
?EMUMOVREGDRX = 0 ;std 0: emulate mov reg, drX
?EMUMOVDRXREG = 0 ;std 0: emulate mov drX, reg
?SUPP32RTM = 1 ;std 1: support int2f, ax=168a, "VIRTUAL SUPPORT"
?CATCHREBOOT = 1 ;std 1; catch ctrl-alt-delete
---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***
Complete thread:
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 03.01.2008, 06:54 (DOSX)
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - DOS386, 03.01.2008, 08:12
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 01:03
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 03.01.2008, 09:19
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 01:05
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 09:44
- SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - DOS386, 04.01.2008, 10:20
- SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 11:12
- SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:39
- SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 11:12
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 07.01.2008, 14:49
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 07.01.2008, 17:42
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:23
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 10:46
- SSE in DOS -> Illegal Instruction Exception - DOS386, 10.01.2008, 01:22
- SSE in DOS -> Illegal Instruction Exception - Steve, 10.01.2008, 08:46
- SSE in DOS -> alignment issues - Rugxulo, 10.01.2008, 22:21
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 10.01.2008, 17:19
- SSE in DOS -> Illegal Instruction Exception - DOS386, 10.01.2008, 01:22
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 10:46
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:23
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 07.01.2008, 17:42
- SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - DOS386, 04.01.2008, 10:20
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 09:44
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 01:05
- SSE in pure DOS - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 06:09
- Secure Socket Extremism in DOS | You maybe have a Page Foul - DOS386, 04.01.2008, 07:52
- SSE in DOS | Page Fault | JEMM386 / HDPMI32 - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:47
- SSE in DOS | Page Fault <- YES, your bug | HDPMI32 - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:19
- SSE2 in DOS | PAQ8o8z (Jan. 6) - Rugxulo, 06.01.2008, 05:09
- SSE2 in DOS | PAQ8o8z (Jan. 6) - DOS386, 08.01.2008, 02:00
- SSE2 in DOS | PAQ8o8z (Jan. 6) - Rugxulo, 06.01.2008, 05:09
- SSE in DOS | Page Fault <- YES, your bug | HDPMI32 - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:19
- SSE in DOS | Page Fault | JEMM386 / HDPMI32 - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:47
- Secure Socket Extremism in DOS | You maybe have a Page Foul - DOS386, 04.01.2008, 07:52
- MS the "only hope"? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 12:11
- MS the "only hope"? - RayeR, 04.01.2008, 18:09
- MS the "only hope"? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 19:16
- MS the "only hope"? - RayeR, 04.01.2008, 22:17
- MS the "only hope"? (Vista DPMI bug: 32 MB max.) - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:31
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:22
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! - RayeR, 05.01.2008, 18:58
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - DOS386, 08.01.2008, 01:47
- NTVDM forever! - Japheth, 08.01.2008, 09:02
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - Steve, 08.01.2008, 13:54
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:19
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - RayeR, 14.01.2008, 21:34
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - DOS386, 08.01.2008, 01:47
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! - RayeR, 05.01.2008, 18:58
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Japheth, 05.01.2008, 11:04
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 05.01.2008, 21:08
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Khusraw, 07.01.2008, 11:06
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 07.01.2008, 14:44
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Japheth, 07.01.2008, 17:34
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:09
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Khusraw, 07.01.2008, 11:06
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 05.01.2008, 21:08
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:22
- MS the "only hope"? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 19:16
- MS the "only hope"? - RayeR, 04.01.2008, 18:09
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - DOS386, 03.01.2008, 08:12