SSE in DOS | Page Fault <- YES, your bug | HDPMI32 (DOSX)
Rugxulo wrote:
> The FreeDOS floppy boot image I provided used HIMEMX only and D3X (ring 0 DPMI)
> built into the .EXE. It worked for me. I know that is could be "more compatible"
But disabling paging to prevent the bug from triggering a PF is cca as smart as neglecting the existence of a bug and banning the reporting person to prevent further posts pointing to this bug
> I didn't write that, that's Matt's mess. It does work in DOS, though.
Not for me. The Win32 executable works (compiled by Matt ?), yours doesn't.
> the non-static MinGW .EXEs I tried under HX whined about MSVCRT.DLL
> (a requirement which defeats the purpose of HX, IMO).
Known issue. Probably easy to fix, but I'm not a C expert
> Believe me, it was worse. At least getting it to work in some
> circumstances is better than nothing. I will try tweaking it more eventually.
You should fix the page fault rather than shooting around with covered eyes in the hope to shoot the SSE2/CR4 issue
> > Tried to install DOS besides XP or Vista ?
> Yet another can of worms to open (ugh).
I had thought XP/Vi$ta would contain and attract worms, not DOS
> Yes, you have to enable that, which makes the chip assume you have OS
> support which calls FXSAVE and FXRSTOR when needed (although DOS
> single-tasking doesn't have to).
You should remove the CR4 code (since HDPMI32 cares), remove the V86 "code" (there is no "V86" in PM DPMI code) and fix the SSE-unrelated bugs. Maybe you introduced them, maybe they origin from Matt but he has the luck that they don't generate symptoms on Win32
PS: definitely NOT a JEMM386 issue
PPSS: PAQ9 is out
---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***
Complete thread:
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 03.01.2008, 06:54 (DOSX)
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - DOS386, 03.01.2008, 08:12
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 01:03
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 03.01.2008, 09:19
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 01:05
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 09:44
- SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - DOS386, 04.01.2008, 10:20
- SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 11:12
- SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:39
- SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 11:12
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 07.01.2008, 14:49
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 07.01.2008, 17:42
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:23
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 10:46
- SSE in DOS -> Illegal Instruction Exception - DOS386, 10.01.2008, 01:22
- SSE in DOS -> Illegal Instruction Exception - Steve, 10.01.2008, 08:46
- SSE in DOS -> alignment issues - Rugxulo, 10.01.2008, 22:21
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 10.01.2008, 17:19
- SSE in DOS -> Illegal Instruction Exception - DOS386, 10.01.2008, 01:22
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 10:46
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:23
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 07.01.2008, 17:42
- SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - DOS386, 04.01.2008, 10:20
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 09:44
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 01:05
- SSE in pure DOS - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 06:09
- Secure Socket Extremism in DOS | You maybe have a Page Foul - DOS386, 04.01.2008, 07:52
- SSE in DOS | Page Fault | JEMM386 / HDPMI32 - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:47
- SSE in DOS | Page Fault <- YES, your bug | HDPMI32 - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:19
- SSE2 in DOS | PAQ8o8z (Jan. 6) - Rugxulo, 06.01.2008, 05:09
- SSE2 in DOS | PAQ8o8z (Jan. 6) - DOS386, 08.01.2008, 02:00
- SSE2 in DOS | PAQ8o8z (Jan. 6) - Rugxulo, 06.01.2008, 05:09
- SSE in DOS | Page Fault <- YES, your bug | HDPMI32 - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:19
- SSE in DOS | Page Fault | JEMM386 / HDPMI32 - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:47
- Secure Socket Extremism in DOS | You maybe have a Page Foul - DOS386, 04.01.2008, 07:52
- MS the "only hope"? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 12:11
- MS the "only hope"? - RayeR, 04.01.2008, 18:09
- MS the "only hope"? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 19:16
- MS the "only hope"? - RayeR, 04.01.2008, 22:17
- MS the "only hope"? (Vista DPMI bug: 32 MB max.) - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:31
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:22
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! - RayeR, 05.01.2008, 18:58
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - DOS386, 08.01.2008, 01:47
- NTVDM forever! - Japheth, 08.01.2008, 09:02
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - Steve, 08.01.2008, 13:54
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:19
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - RayeR, 14.01.2008, 21:34
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - DOS386, 08.01.2008, 01:47
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! - RayeR, 05.01.2008, 18:58
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Japheth, 05.01.2008, 11:04
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 05.01.2008, 21:08
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Khusraw, 07.01.2008, 11:06
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 07.01.2008, 14:44
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Japheth, 07.01.2008, 17:34
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:09
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Khusraw, 07.01.2008, 11:06
- A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 05.01.2008, 21:08
- MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:22
- MS the "only hope"? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 19:16
- MS the "only hope"? - RayeR, 04.01.2008, 18:09
- SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - DOS386, 03.01.2008, 08:12