DOS ain't dead

SSE in DOS -> Illegal Instruction Exception (DOSX)

posted by Steve  , US, 10.01.2008, 08:46

> Anyway, MMX against NOASM test:
>
> MMX is 2 times faster. This is no evidence of usefulness of MMX at all -
> here MMX ASM competed against C++ mess. Rewriting the "NOASM" C++ stuff
> into optimized 80386 compatible ASM would possibly reduce MMX's benefit
> from 2 to a value dangerously close to 1

Evidence? If true, then good news - programmers can keep using P90s or less, and stop bothering to learn C++.

Complete thread:

• SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 03.01.2008, 06:54 (DOSX)
  • SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - DOS386, 03.01.2008, 08:12
    • SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 01:03
  • SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 03.01.2008, 09:19
    • SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 01:05
      • SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 09:44
        • SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - DOS386, 04.01.2008, 10:20
          • SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 11:12
            • SSE in HDPMI / bug (c/c) - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:39
        • SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 07.01.2008, 14:49
          • SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 07.01.2008, 17:42
            • SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:23
              • SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 10:46
                • SSE in DOS -> Illegal Instruction Exception - DOS386, 10.01.2008, 01:22
                  • SSE in DOS -> Illegal Instruction Exception - Steve, 10.01.2008, 08:46
                  • SSE in DOS -> alignment issues - Rugxulo, 10.01.2008, 22:21
                • SSE in DOS under JEMM386 ?? - Japheth, 10.01.2008, 17:19
  • SSE in pure DOS - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 06:09
    • Secure Socket Extremism in DOS | You maybe have a Page Foul - DOS386, 04.01.2008, 07:52
      • SSE in DOS | Page Fault | JEMM386 / HDPMI32 - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:47
        • SSE in DOS | Page Fault <- YES, your bug | HDPMI32 - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:19
          • SSE2 in DOS | PAQ8o8z (Jan. 6) - Rugxulo, 06.01.2008, 05:09
            • SSE2 in DOS | PAQ8o8z (Jan. 6) - DOS386, 08.01.2008, 02:00
  • MS the "only hope"? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 12:11
    • MS the "only hope"? - RayeR, 04.01.2008, 18:09
      • MS the "only hope"? - Japheth, 04.01.2008, 19:16
        • MS the "only hope"? - RayeR, 04.01.2008, 22:17
        • MS the "only hope"? (Vista DPMI bug: 32 MB max.) - Rugxulo, 04.01.2008, 22:31
          • MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! - DOS386, 05.01.2008, 02:22
            • MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! - RayeR, 05.01.2008, 18:58
              • MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - DOS386, 08.01.2008, 01:47
                • NTVDM forever! - Japheth, 08.01.2008, 09:02
                • MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - Steve, 08.01.2008, 13:54
                • MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:19
                • MS the "only hope" ? NOT for me !!! Multiboot - RayeR, 14.01.2008, 21:34
          • A TSR worth a try in Vista - Japheth, 05.01.2008, 11:04
            • A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 05.01.2008, 21:08
              • A TSR worth a try in Vista - Khusraw, 07.01.2008, 11:06
                • A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 07.01.2008, 14:44
                • A TSR worth a try in Vista - Japheth, 07.01.2008, 17:34
                • A TSR worth a try in Vista - Rugxulo, 09.01.2008, 01:09