Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

--- DEATH --- (Developers)

posted by sol, 21.12.2007, 22:30

> It this maybe related to King Udo's "not very good" performance as forum
> administrator in the past ? IMHO one should keep his (crappy) admin
> performance separated from (good) FAT32+ implemented by him as first. You
> can try to punish King Udo by hating FAT32+ ... same as Jack tried to
> punish FreeDOS users for some (what was it at all ???) :crying:
>
> Funny enough, King Udo implemented FAT32+, and the only who cares and even
> defends it is the bad guy previously banned from his forum :lol3:

FAT32+ is stupid not because Udo may not be a good admin, it's stupid because:

1) It's a hack; it adds yet another layer of crap onto a poor designed specification.

2) It breaks compatibility. It does. There is nothing worth arguing here. Here are some obvious ways in how it breaks compatibility:

a) It requires storing additional data the FAT32 spec does not mention. this means some disk scanners will cause data loss.

b) It's a private specification, so most OSes out there will not be able to copy the files on/off with this method.

c) Existing DOS programs use counters, and many function calls with 32-bit pointers; file seeking, writes, etc. These will break.

3) There are already other file systems out there that are good, have LFN, and don't have these problems! Implemented one of these!

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 299 users online (0 registered, 299 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum