Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

--- DEATH --- (Developers)

posted by sol, 23.12.2007, 23:29

> Support for external file systems is important, but DOS having a native
> format for files > 4 GB, based on FAT32 and stable for other OSes is not
> proven yet to be impossible. In such a concept one file > 4 GB will be
> seen as multiple files in Windows/Linux, all < 4 GB and all of course
> "perfectly valid".

The problem here is that you're calling UFS/FFS/etc "external file systems" while not referring to FAT32+ or a new FAT as such. Since old DOSes, other OSes & old tools will not recognize the file system, or will corrupt it, it's pretty much a new or external file system.

So --- we're already adding support for a new filesystem. Why not do it right?

Why base it off FAT, which is bad by design?

It's not efficient. It gets fragmented horribly. LFN was hacked in. If we're still using 28 bits of the FAT, iirc we're restricting ourselves to 2 TB for partition size. I've already reached 1 TB in my PC. In another year, we'll be at 2 TB and the file system will have reached its limit. It doesn't handle corruption well at all. Etc.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 309 users online (1 registered, 308 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum