Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

--- DEATH --- (Developers)

posted by DOS386, 21.12.2007, 22:46
(edited by DOS386 on 21.12.2007, 22:58)

> It's a hack; it adds yet another layer of crap onto a poor designed specification.

There are much worse "layers of crap" :-P

> It breaks compatibility. It does. There is nothing worth arguing here.

NTSC also broke it. Intentionally. It did. Nothing worth arguing here.

> additional data the FAT32 spec does not mention. this means
> some disk scanners will cause data loss.

NOT true. They can "legally" truncate the > 4 GiB files at most. Anyway, old "disk scanners" will cause data loss to LFN's, FAT32 or NTSC or any other non-FAT partitions as well. So, prohibit anything beyond FAT16 :clap:

> private specification

Lie. It's open. Unlike NTSC for example.

> so most OSes out there will not be able

Most OS'es can't access Loonix filesytems either ... one more shot into the wrong direction :lol3:

> Existing DOS programs use counters, and many function calls with 32-bit pointers

True but nonsense argument. Most existing Win32 programs used 32-bit counters (or even worse signed) at the time M$ started to push NTSC as well.

> These will break.

Nothing will break. They will keep the limit of 2 GiB or 4 GiB they used to have before.

> other file systems out there that are good, have LFN, and don't have these problems!

More details please :hungry:

> Implemented one of these!

Bug ? Past ? Or imperative ? :lol3:

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 274 users online (0 registered, 274 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum