Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

NOISE-FS outperforms them all !!! (Developers)

posted by Rugxulo Homepage, Usono, 02.01.2009, 04:25

> > Anyways, writing / porting a new file system for DOS is a pipe dream.
>
> OK ...

I didn't mean this as any discouragement or insult, only that few developers are available (if any) who are skilled enough to add this to FreeDOS.

> > which is easiest to port?
> > guess ext2, but I really really have no clue
>
> Most likely ext2 since oldest, heh :-D

It sure is popular in Linux distros, but they'll probably switch to ext4 pretty soon.

> It's completely stupid to add a third rate hack of a filesystem which
> will be incorrectly recognized and corrupted by all kinds of other OSes
> and software.

None of that matters as long as nobody else is writing / porting anything else. Besides, if you only use that particular DOS, there are no incompatibilities!

> Add a filesystem that took longer than 10 minutes to design.
> Implement something that isn't crap - and benefit from the code
> that already exists.

I'm not sure existing *nix/POSIX C code is really directly useful for porting to FreeDOS. It may actually turn out to be easier to roll their own. I mean, it's not like all the *nixes out there agree on sharing a standard file system.

> Ext2/3 and UFS have drivers under Windows & Unixes - this "FAT32+"
> stuff has to be done from scratch and has nothing but drawbacks.

I'm not exactly an advocate of FAT32+ (never tried it), but hey, if it works and nothing else is available, how can we complain?

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 273 users online (0 registered, 273 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum