Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

NOISE-FS outperforms them all !!! (Developers)

posted by DOS386, 30.12.2008, 23:06

Japheth wrote:

> If you believe that you have something of value

YES. It's just in a bit early stage.

> Just troll noise probably isn't regarded as "valuable" by some

Good point, although not very new. Last time after you pointed this it was also you who got banned almost immediately, not me. :lol3:

Rugxulo wrote:

> > IIRC FreeDOS 1.1 is scheduled for beginning of 2008 :-(
> But no file system work has been done.
> This is strictly a minor upgrade / maintenance release.

Right.

> And I think you meant 2009, but even that is highly optimistic.

It was indeed 2008 :-|

> supposedly faster with less fragmentation than FAT

How big HD's, how much RAM hogged ?

> patent is almost expired (Nov. 2009)

Not sufficient reason to love it :-|

> creation / access / mod times (which FAT32 has but FD disabled for speed)

Thanks God :-)

> Anyways, writing / porting a new file system for DOS is a pipe dream.

OK ...

> We need to have a poll for what file system would be best:
> ext2, ext3, ext4, ntfs, hpfs, jfs, other?
> guess the real questions are: which is most popular?

NTSC (and at same time it sucks most, heh :-( )

> which is most useful?

???

> which is easiest to port?
> guess ext2, but I really really have no clue

Most likely ext2 since oldest, heh :-D

cm wrote:

> Depends on how you write the driver.
> Writing Real Mode code would make many file systems at least difficult.

Most notably slow :-(

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 258 users online (2 registered, 256 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum